575 items found
Led By
Estevan Vigil and George Schisler
Study Area
Statewide
Project Status
Completed
Research Objectives
- To understand the potential and current consequences of gill lice on economically and ecologically important fish.
- To determine gill lice distribution in Colorado.
Project Description
In Colorado, gill lice, a parasitic copepod (group of small crustaceans), can infect cutthroat trout, kokanee salmon and rainbow trout, which are ecologically and economically important fish species in Colorado. Gill lice are very host-specific, and thus far, only one species of gill lice (Salmincola californiensis) has been identified in Colorado.
Gill lice attach to and damage the gills of the host fish, interfering with oxygen exchange. As a result, infections can negatively affect fish behavior, immune system function, growth, warm water tolerance and survival.
Fisheries managers are concerned about gill lice in Colorado because the parasite is resistant to chemical treatments and thus very difficult to control. Further, very little research has been conducted on gill lice, making management challenging.
CPW initiated research to learn more about gill lice, specifically gill lice distribution in the state and the impacts of gill lice on Colorado's fish. Currently, CPW is the only agency conducting research on gill lice in Colorado and one of only a few in all of western North America.
With a greater understanding of gill lice, managers will be able to make management decisions that help protect and preserve Colorado's fish populations.
Associated Publications
Vigil, E. M., K. R. Christianson, J. M. Lepak, and P. J. Williams. 2016. Temperature effects on hatching and viability of juvenile gill lice, Salmincola californiensis. Journal of Fish Diseases 39:899–905.
Hargis, L.N., Lepak, J.M., Vigil, E.M., and Gunn, C. 2014. Prevalence and intensity of the parasitic copepod (Salmincola californiensis) on kokanee salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) in a Colorado reservoir. Southwestern Naturalist 59(1):126-129. 2014. Fact SheetGill Lice in Colorado
[show more]Led By
Lake and Reservoir Researchers
Study Area
Select reservoirs
Project Status
Ongoing
Research Objectives
- Monitor gill lice infection prevalence and intensity on kokanee salmon and rainbow trout populations in key reservoirs in relation to environmental conditions to identify factors contributing to high parasite burdens and potential mitigation strategies.
Project Description
Gill lice, parasitic copepods (group of small crustaceans), can infect cutthroat trout, kokanee salmon and rainbow trout, which are ecologically and economically important fish species in Colorado. Gill lice are very host-specific, and thus far, only one species of gill lice (Salmincola californiensis) has been identified in Colorado.
Gill lice attach to and damage the gills of host fish, interfering with oxygen exchange. As a result, infections can negatively affect fish behavior, immune system function, growth, warm water tolerance and survival.
Fisheries managers are concerned about gill lice in Colorado because the parasite is resistant to chemical treatments and very difficult to control. Further, very little research has been conducted on gill lice, making management challenging.
Lake and Reservoir Researchers have been monitoring gill lice infestations within kokanee and rainbow trout populations in select reservoirs to better understand how different factors such as the density of vulnerable fish, environmental conditions, and water level fluctuations interact to influence parasite burdens.
With a greater understanding of gill lice dynamics, we may be able to identify management strategies that effectively limit infection prevalence and intensity.
Associated Publications
Hargis, L.N., J.M. Lepak, E.M. Vigil, and C. Gunn. 2014. Prevalence and intensity of the parasitic copepod (Salmincola californiensis) on kokanee salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) in a Colorado reservoir. Southwestern Naturalist 59:126-129.
Lepak, J.M., A.G. Hansen, M.B. Hooten, D. Brauch, and E.M. Vigil. 2022. Rapid proliferation of the parasitic copepod Salmincola californiensis (Dana) on kokanee salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka (Walbaum), in a large Colorado reservoir. Journal of Fish Diseases 45:89-98 (Cover image and story for journal issue).
Vigil, E.M., K.R. Christianson, J.M. Lepak, and P.J. Williams. 2016. Temperature effects on hatching and viability of juvenile gill lice, Salmincola californiensis. Journal of Fish Diseases 39:899-905.
[show more]Human-bear conflict
Black bear
Human-bear conflict
Black bear
Led By
Lake and Reservoir Researchers
Study Area
Statewide
Project Status
Completed
Research Objectives
- To better understand the bioaccumulation of mercury in sport fish, inform development of consumption advisories, and minimize health risks to anglers.
Project Description
According to the Environmental Protection Agency and Food and Drug Administration, fish represent an excellent source of low-calorie protein. However, eating fish with high mercury concentrations can be a potential health risk.
To protect the health of Colorado's anglers and maintain the quality of angling opportunities, the Lake and Reservoir Research group investigates methods to reduce mercury concentrations in fish, and act as sport fish and food web advisor’s to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment’s Technical Advisory Committee on mercury advisories.
A recent study on Narraguinnep Reservoir (southwest Colorado) conducted by CPW and researchers from Colorado State University found that ‘triploid’ walleye (have a third set of chromosomes and cannot reproduce naturally) stocked by CPW had 22-24% lower mercury concentrations on average than their normal, naturally-reproducing ‘diploid’ counterparts. This study revealed that stocking triploid fish alone or in tandem with other mitigation strategies can lead to safer fish for anglers to eat.
The inability of triploid walleye to reproduce affects their mercury levels. Spawning is energetically costly, particularly for female fish that need to develop eggs. As a result, normal, diploid walleye need to eat more food to grow and successfully spawn every year when compared to triploid walleye. Since most (>95%) of the mercury present in predatory fish comes from their prey, eating less food to grow the same amount means triploid fish are exposed to less mercury, and have lower mercury concentrations.
Another recent study was conducted in Colorado to determine the best predictors of mercury concentrations in small walleye and smallmouth bass (15 inches) and large (34 inches) northern pike. We used a machine learning approach to test the different predictors and found that the best predictors of walleye and smallmouth bass mercury concentrations where system-specific measurements of productivity and forage base quality (the higher the productivity and quality of the forage base, the lower the mercury concentrations). The best predictors of large northern pike mercury concentrations were related to the stocking of catchable rainbow trout. Data indicated that large northern pike often eat stocked rainbow trout, and as a result, northern pike mercury concentrations can be lower where heavy rainbow trout stocking occurs (diluted by high calorie prey containing relatively little mercury). This approach could be applied to identify potential areas/systems of concern, and predict whether sport fish Hg concentrations may change as a result of a variety of factors to help prioritize, focus, and streamline monitoring efforts to effectively and efficiently inform human and ecological health.
Associated Publications
Farrell, C.J., B.M. Johnson, A.G. Hansen, and C.M. Myrick. 2022. Induced triploidy reduces mercury bioaccumulation in a piscivorous fish. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 79:202-212 (Received Editor’s Choice Award).
Eagles-Smith, C.A., J.G. Wiener, C. Eckley, J.J. Willacker, D.C. Evers, M. Marvin-DiPasquale, D. Obrist, J. Fleck, G. Aiken, J.M. Lepak, A.K. Jackson, J. Webster, A.R. Stewart, J. Davis, C. Alpers, and J.T. Ackerman. 2016. Mercury in western North America: a synthesis of environmental contamination, fluxes, bioaccumulation and risk to fish and wildlife. Science of the Total Environment 568:1213-1226.
Eagles-Smith, C.A., J.T. Ackerman, J.J. Willacker, M.T. Tate, M.A. Lutz, J. Fleck, A.R. Stewart, J.G. Wiener, D.C. Evers, J.M. Lepak, J. Davis, and C. Flanagan Pritz. 2016. Spatial and temporal patterns of mercury concentrations in freshwater fishes across the Western US and Canada. Science of the Total Environment 568:1171-1184.
Jackson, A., D.C. Evers, C.A. Eagles-Smith, J.T. Ackerman, J.J. Willacker, J.T. Elliott, J.M. Lepak, S.S. VanderPol, and C.E. Bryan. 2016. Mercury risk to avian piscivores across the western United States and Canada. Science of the Total Environment 568:685-696.
Johnson, B.M., J.M. Lepak, and B.A. Wolff. 2015. Effects of prey assemblage on mercury bioaccumulation in a piscivorous sport fish. Science of the Total Environment 506-507:330-337.
Lepak, J.M., M.B. Hooten, C.A. Eagles-Smith, M.T. Tate, M.A. Lutz, J.T. Ackerman, J.J.Jr. Willacker, D.C. Evers, J.G. Wiener, C. Flanagan Pritz, and J. Davis. 2016. Assessing potential health risks to fish and humans using mercury concentrations in inland fish from across western Canada and the United States. Science of the Total Environment 571:342-354.
Lepak, J.M., M.B. Hooten, and B.M. Johnson. 2012. The influence of external subsidies on diet, growth and Hg concentrations of freshwater sport fish: implications for fisheries management and the development of fish consumption advisories. Ecotoxicology 21(7):1878-1888.
Lepak, J.M., K.D. Kinzli, E.R. Fetherman, W.M. Pate, A.G. Hansen, E.I. Gardunio, C.N. Cathcart, W.L. Stacy, Z.E. Underwood, M.M. Brandt, C.M. Myrick, and B.M. Johnson. 2012. Manipulation of growth to reduce sport fish mercury concentrations on a whole-lake scale. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 69(1):122-135.
Lepak, J.M., B.A. Wolff, B.M. Johnson M.B. Hooten, and A.G. Hansen. 2023. Predicting sport fish mercury contamination in heavily managed reservoirs: implications for human and ecological health. PLOS ONE 18:e0285890.
Stacy, W.L., and J.M. Lepak. 2012. Relative influence of prey mercury concentration, prey energy density and predator sex on sport fish mercury concentrations. Science of the Total Environment 437:104-109.
Taylor, M.S., C.T. Driscoll, J.M. Lepak, D.C. Josephson, K.J. Jirka, and C.E. Kraft. 2020. Temporal trends in fish mercury concentrations in an Adirondack Lake managed with a continual predator removal program. Ecotoxicology 29:1762-1773.
Willacker, J.J., C.A. Eagles-Smith, M.A. Lutz, M.T. Tate, J.T. Ackerman, and J.M. Lepak. 2016. The influence of reservoirs and their water management on fish mercury concentrations in Western North America. Science of the Total Environment 568:739-748.
Wolff, B.A., B.M. Johnson, and J.M. Lepak. 2017. Changes in sport fish mercury concentrations from food web shifts suggest partial decoupling from mercury loading in two Colorado reservoirs. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 72:167-177.
[show more]Led By
Study Area
Statewide
Project Status
Ongoing
Research Objectives
- To better understand the bioaccumulation of mercury in sport fish.
Project Description
According to the Environmental Protection Agency and Food and Drug Administration, fish represent an excellent source of low-calorie protein. However, eating fish with high mercury concentrations can be a potential health risk.
To protect the health of Colorado's anglers and maintain the quality of angling opportunities, the Lake and Reservoir Research group investigates methods to reduce mercury concentrations in fish.
For example, researchers conducted a study to determine if manipulating predatory sport fish growth would decrease mercury concentrations. For this particular project, researchers monitored a northern pike (top predator) population in College Lake, a 25-hectare reservoir located on the Colorado State University Foothills Research Campus in Fort Collins, Colo. Researchers took tissue biopsies from northern pike before and two months after College Lake was stocked with rainbow trout, a high energy, low-mercury concentration prey species. The result was a decrease in northern pike mercury concentrations equivalent to their weight gain (with some fish gaining over 35 percent of their own body weight in two months with a corresponding reduction in mercury concentration of approximately 35 percent).
Results from the study showed that stocking high quality, low-mercury prey is a rapid and effective method to reduce sport fish concentrations. However, researchers found that this method is only temporarily effective; once the stocked prey fish are all eaten, predatory fish growth slows and mercury concentrations return to their former levels. Continuously stocking prey fish can be expensive, especially in large lakes and reservoirs. Thus, results from this study revealed that managing for naturally occurring and reproducing populations of prey fish with high energy and low-mercury concentrations would be more economically and ecologically beneficial.
The Lake and Reservoir Research group will continue to characterize and potentially minimize health risks posed by mercury to anglers, their families and wildlife that consume sport fish and other fish.
Associated Publications
Lepak, J.M., Hooten, M.B., and Johnson, B.M. 2012. The influence of external subsidies on diet, growth and Hg concentrations of freshwater sport fish: implications for fisheries management and the development of fish consumption advisories. Ecotoxicology. 21(7):1878-1888.
Stacy, W.L., and Lepak, J.M. 2012. Relative influence of prey mercury concentration, prey energy density and predator sex on sport fish mercury concentrations. Science of the Total Environment. 437:104-109.
Lepak, J.M., Kinzli, K.D., Fetherman, E.R., Pate, W.M., Hansen, A.G., Gardunio, E.I., Cathcart, C.N., Stacy, W.L., Underwood, Z.E., Brandt, M.M., Myrick, C.M., and Johnson, B.M. 2012. Manipulation of growth to reduce sport fish mercury concentrations on a whole-lake scale. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 69(1):122-135.
[show more]Led By
Eric Richer and Matt Kondratieff
Study Area
Upper Arkansas River within the Crystal Lakes STL, Reddy SWA, and Hayden Flats
Project Status
Ongoing
Research Objectives
- To evaluate effectiveness of stream restoration and habitat enhancement treatments
- To monitor the fishery response to habitat restoration
- To utilize creel surveys to evaluate angler experience in restored areas
Project Description
The objectives of the Upper Arkansas River Habitat Restoration project are to rehabilitate and enhance aquatic habitat for an 11-mile reach of the Arkansas River and Lake Fork on both public and private lands. Funding for this project was obtained under the Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) provisions of CERCLA for harm to natural resources due to hazardous substances released from the California Gulch Superfund Site. This project is designed to improve fish populations in the Arkansas River as compensation to the public. Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) is responsible for habitat restoration and enhancement on approximately five miles of public lands within the Crystal Lakes State Trust Lands (STL), Reddy State Wildlife Area (SWA) and Hayden Flats Arkansas Headwaters Recreation Area.
The NRDA Trustees Council established the following goals for the restoration project:
- Increase trout population density and biomass, including improvement in body condition and fish health.
- Improve age and size class structure by increasing spawning areas where possible and provide refugia for juvenile trout and other native fish.
These goals will be achieved by: stabilizing stream banks and promoting diverse stream morphology; reducing erosion and downstream sedimentation; enhancing overhead cover for trout; and creating diverse in-stream habitat including pools, riffles, and bars.
CPW's Aquatic Research Section is responsible for monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of the restoration project in cooperation with researchers at Colorado State University, Colorado Mountain College and the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Additional information on the project can be found in the publications listed below.
Associated Publications
Richer, E.E., E.A. Gates, A.T. Herdrich, and M.C. Kondratieff. 2017. Upper Arkansas River habitat restoration project: 2013-2015 monitoring report. Colorado Parks and Wildlife Technical Publication 49.
Brinkman, S.F., P.H. Davies, D. Hansen, and N. Vieira. 2006. Arkansas River Research Study. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Fort Collins, Colorado. 153 pp.
Stratus Consulting, Inc. 2010. Draft restoration monitoring and outreach plan for the upper Arkansas River watershed. Boulder, Colorado. 63 pp.
[show more]Habitat restoration
Habitat restoration
Gene flow
Landscape genomics
<em>Puma concolor</em>
Urbanization
Genetic diversity
Gene flow
Landscape genomics
<em>Puma concolor</em>
Urbanization
Genetic diversity
Bayesian regression analysis
Colorado
Habitat selection modeling
Pinyon‐juniper
Presence‐only data
Probability of use
Bayesian regression analysis
Colorado
Habitat selection modeling
Pinyon‐juniper
Presence‐only data
Probability of use
Geographic closure
Mark-recapture
Telemetry
Geographic closure
Mark-recapture
Telemetry
