<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://cpw.cvlcollections.org/items/show/108">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Environmental dynamics and anthropogenic development alter philopatry and space‐use in a North American cervid]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Animal movement]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Energy development]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Home range]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[<em>Odocoileus hemionus</em>]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Utilization distribution]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[<p class="article-section__sub-title section1"><strong>Aim</strong></p>
<p>The space an animal uses over a given time period must provide the resources required for meeting energetic needs, reproducing and avoiding predation. Anthropogenic landscape change in concert with environmental dynamics can strongly structure space-use. Investigating these dynamics can provide critical insight into animal ecology, conservation and management.</p>
<p class="article-section__sub-title section1"><strong>Location</strong></p>
<p>The Piceance Basin, Colorado, USA.</p>
<p class="article-section__sub-title section1"><strong>Methods</strong></p>
<p>We applied a novel utilization distribution estimation technique based on a continuous-time correlated random walk model to characterize range dynamics of mule deer during winter and summer seasons across multiple years. This approach leverages second-order properties of movement to provide a probabilistic estimate of space-use. We assessed the influence of environmental (cover and forage), individual and anthropogenic factors on interannual variation in range use of individual deer using a hierarchical Bayesian regression framework.</p>
<p class="article-section__sub-title section1">Results</p>
<p>Mule deer demonstrated remarkable spatial philopatry, with a median of 50% overlap (range: 8–78%) in year-to-year utilization distributions. Environmental conditions were the primary driver of both philopatry and range size, with anthropogenic disturbance playing a secondary role.</p>
<p class="article-section__sub-title section1"><strong>Main conclusions</strong></p>
<p>Philopatry in mule deer is suspected to reflect the importance of spatial familiarity (memory) to this species and, therefore, factors driving spatial displacement are of conservation concern. The interaction between range behaviour and dynamics in development disturbance and environmental conditions highlights mechanisms by which anthropogenic environmental change may displace deer from familiar areas and alter their foraging and survival strategies.</p>]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Northrup, Joseph M.]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Anderson Jr, Charles R.]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Wittemyer, George]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:created><![CDATA[2016-01-05]]></dcterms:created>
    <dcterms:rights><![CDATA[<a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted</a>]]></dcterms:rights>
    <dcterms:isPartOf><![CDATA[Diversity and Distributions]]></dcterms:isPartOf>
    <dcterms:format><![CDATA[application/pdf]]></dcterms:format>
    <dcterms:extent><![CDATA[11 pages]]></dcterms:extent>
    <dcterms:language><![CDATA[English]]></dcterms:language>
    <dcterms:type><![CDATA[Article]]></dcterms:type>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation><![CDATA[Northrup, J. M., C. R. Anderson Jr, and G. Wittemyer. 2016. Environmental dynamics and anthropogenic development alter philopatry and space‐use in a North American cervid. Diversity and Distributions 22:547–557. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12417" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12417</a>]]></dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
