<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="248" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://cpw.cvlcollections.org/items/show/248?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-06-05T22:28:34+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="395">
      <src>https://cpw.cvlcollections.org/files/original/bd83776038bb401409ea09ebacc444ce.pdf</src>
      <authentication>0672492a58351ea7fd61f58ad622e88d</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="92">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4381">
                  <text>The research in this publication was partially or fully funded by Colorado Parks and Wildlife.

Dan Prenzlow, Director, Colorado Parks and Wildlife • Parks and Wildlife Commission: Marvin McDaniel, Chair • Carrie Besnette Hauser, Vice-Chair
Marie Haskett, Secretary • Taishya Adams • Betsy Blecha • Charles Garcia • Dallas May • Duke Phillips, IV • Luke B. Schafer • James Jay Tutchton • Eden Vardy

�RESPONSE OF WATERBIRDS TO EXPERIMENTAL DISTURBANCES
JANET L. GEORGE 1 , Department of Fishery and Wildlife Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
CLAIT E. BRAUN, Colorado Division of Wildlife, Wildlife Research Center, 317 West Prospect Road, Fort Collins, CO
80526
RONALD A. RYDER, Department of Fishery and Wildlife Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
EUGENE DECKER, Department of Fishery and Wildlife Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Abstract: Responses of waterbirds to experimental disturbances were studied from April 1984 to August 1985 at Russell Lakes State
Wildlife Area in the San Luis Valley, Colorado. Black-crowned night-herons (Nycticorax nycticorax), snowy egrets (Egrelta thula)
and white-faced ibis (Plegadis chihi) were approached directly by a person on foot or in a motor vehicle. Mean (±SD) flushing
distances for these species were 153±66, 93±43, and 95±48 m when approached on foot and 47±26, 57±27, and 54±27 m when
approached in a motor vehicle. Reactions of American coots (Fulica americana), redheads (Aythya americana), ruddy ducks (O;ryura
jamaicensis), mallards (Anas platyrhynchos), gadwalls (A. strepera) and American avocets (Recurvirostra americana) to disturbance
were also quantified. Intensity of response was independent of agent of disturbances (i.e., person on foot or in vehicle) for all
species. Disturbance reduced species diversity and abundance for up to one hour. American coots and avocets were only minimally
impacted by the disturbance agents used.
Key words: American avocet, American coot, black-crowned night-heron, Colorado, disturbance, gadwall, mallard, recreation,
redhead, ruddy duck, snowy egret, waterbirds, white-faced ibis.

As the number and area of wetlands in North America
have declined, participation in nonconsumptive wildlife
recreation has increased (Tyre and James 1971, Aney and
Cowan 1975, Gray 1975, Fazio and Belli 1977, Shaw et al.
1978, Arthur 1979, More 1979, U.S. Dep. Inter. 1982,
Boyle and Samson 1983). This trend is expected to continue,
considering demographic trends in the United States
(Yeosting and Burkhead 1973, Belli 1977). Wetlands may
receive more nonconsumptive wildlife use than surrounding
uplands because they support greater species diversity. Also,
many wetland birds such as herons, egrets, ibis and
waterfowl are relatively large and easy to observe,
characteristics that attract nonconsumptive wildlife users
(Gray 1975). Thus, the need to protect wetlands and, at the
same time, provide additional viewing opportunity presents
a management dilemma.
This study was initiated in response to increased demand
for nonconsumptive wildlife activities that may stress
sensitive species in wetland habitats. Objectives were to: (1)
measure the effects of two methods of public viewing on
Ciconiiformes and (2) test a method of investigating the
effects of recreation-related disturbances on marsh birds.
This study was supported by the Colorado Division of
Wildlife through the Nongame Checkoff Fund. Colorado
State University provided assistance in design and statistical
analysis. R. M. Bartmann and R. W. Hoffman reviewed the
manuscript.

lake bed bordered by the Sangre de Cristo Mountains on the
east and the San Juan Mountains on the west. The mountain
ranges meet at Poncha Pass to form the northern boundary
of the valley. To the south the Valley extends into New
Mexico. Elevations vary from 2,285 to 2,400 m with
Russell Lakes at approximately 2,300 m.
The average annual precipitation in Saguache, about ten
kilometers north of the study area, was 26.8 cm from 1931
to 1960 (U.S. Dep. Commerce 1978). Although the climate
of the San Luis Valley is arid, a high water table and irrigation run-off results in numerous shallow, alkaline lakes and
marshes. Russell Lakes State Wildlife Area (SWA) consisted
of six natural lakes and numerous human-made ponds. All
wetlands received supplemental water from artesian wells.
Vegetation of the valley floor is dominated by an
association of black greasewood (Sarcobatus vermiculatus)
rabbitbrush (C hrysothamnus spp.) and inland saltgrass
(Distichiis stricta). Wetlands are dominated by hardstem
bulrush (Scripus acutus), baltic rush (Juncus balticus), and
common cattail (Typha latifolia). Baltic rush is the
dominant emergent in water &lt; 15 cm in depth. Hardstern
bulrush is dominant in water from 15 to 150 cm in depth.

l\lETHODS
Flushing distances of black-crowned night-herons,
white-faced ibis and snowy egrets were measured from April
through June 1985. Groups of resting and feeding birds in
the immediate vicinity of Russell Lakes SWA were located
on clear calm mornings. Each group was approached at a
slow, steady rate by either a person on foot or in a motor
vehicle until the bird(s) nushed. The distance (± 2m) from
the disturbance agent to where the bird(s) had flushed was

STUDY AREA
The study was conducted al Russell Lakes State Wildlife
Area (37° 57'N, 106° 07'W) in the northern San Luis Valley,
Colorado (Fig. 1). The San (uis Valley is a Oat, ancient
1Present

address: Ci1y of Boulder Open Space, 1405 South Foothills Highway, Boulder, CO 80303.

52

1991.

Proc. Issues and Technology in the Management of Impacted Western Wildlife.
Thorne Ecol. Inst. 5:52-59.

�j.. j,..

measured with a Leitz rangcfinder. Mean flushing distances
between disturbance agents and species were compared using
t tests.
Disturbance trials were conducted during July 1984 and
April-July 1985 in one portion of Russell Lakes SWA.
During trials in 1984, American coots, redheads, ruddy ducks
and mallards were counted immediately before and
immediately after a disturbance and at fifteen-minute
intervals for one hour following the disturbance. These four
species were the most common on the test area. Other
species also occurred in the area but their presence during
trials was not dependable. The agent of disturbance was one
person on foot for all trials and all responses of selected
species were quantified (Table 1).
In 1985 disturbance trials were modified to include two
disturbance agents, two additional species and a count
interval shortened to increase sample size. Disturbances were
either a person on foot or in a motor vehicle. Disturbance
agents traveled along a dike and returned at a slow, steady
speed. Selected species were counted before the disturbance
and at five-minute intervals for one hour after a disturbance
from one of two elevated blinds that were entered out of
view of the disturbance trial area. Responses were tested for
independence with a chi-square test

"'"

Table 1. Quantification of marsh bird responses to
disturbance.

COLORAOO
•DENVER

eGRAND

Ju-4CTION

•PUEBLO

F'ONCHA
~

,t..J-.
"

J(:,.

l&gt;-

4:'.. " " .

&amp;\

"'~

~"-A
AA

RIOGRAN

Response values
0
1
2
3

4

00UITY ROAD R

Response
No obvious response
Subjects watched disturbance
Subjects swam away from disturbance
Subjects "ran" on water or dove
Subjects flew from wetland

RESULTS
Flushing Distance
Snowy egrets flushed at distances of 93±43 m (n = 16)
when approached on foot compared to 57± 27 m (n = 28)
when approached in a motor vehicle. Flushing distances for
white-faced ibis were nearly identical to those of snowy
egrets, averaging 95±48 (n = 42) and 54± 27m (n = 14),
respectively, when approached on foot or in a vehicle.
Although sample sizes for black-crowned night-herons were
small, mean flushing distance from a person on foot
(153±66 m [n = 41) was greater than when approached in a
vehicle (47±26 m [n = 21). Within a species, there was no
difference (P ~ 0.25) in mean flushing distance between
disturbance agents. Birds flushed nearly twice as far from
a person on Coot, however, versus a person in a motor
vehicle.
Figure 1. Russell Lakes area, San Luis Valley, Colorado

53

�DISCUSSION

Disturbance Trials
American Coot- The number of American coots

Flushing distances measured at Russell Lakes SW A
supports the observation that wild animals are less disturbed
by observers in motor vehicles than observers on foot
(Schultz and Bailey 1978, Profera 1984). Due to small
sample sizes and high variance, differences between
disturbance agents used were not significant. Variance could
be reduced in future studies with larger sample sizes for each
agent of disturbance and species.
Black-crowned night-herons were poorly represented in
the samples, possibly because they feed after dark. Thus,
flushing distances outside rookeries were difficult to obtain
during daylight. It is possible that night-herons may be less
vulnerable to human disturbance outside rookeries due to
their nocturnal behavior.
Group size of approached birds may have contributed to
variance in flushing distances. Birds may tolerate
approaching humans or vehicles because individuals feel
more secure in groups than alone. Group size in future
studies should be stratified into categories: I, 2-5, &gt;5. etc.
Group size was recorded in this study but small sample sizes
precluded stratifying before analysis.
Flushing distances varied more for a person on foot
despite larger sample sizes for two of the three species tested
with this disturbance agent. Ciconiiformes appeared to · be
uniformly tolerant of vehicles but varied greatly in their
tolerance of persons on foot. This could be related to the
extent of habituation among individuals. Over tim~.
responses to a person on foot may diminish due to
habituation.
Declines in species diversity following disturbances
were detected in all trials despite varying responses among
species. Mallards and gadwalls flushed and did not return
during the following hour. In some tests, birds landed in the
pond during the trial and were counted. It could not be
determined, however, if these birds were the same individuals
that had flushed. Marked birds in future studies would allow
observers to identify individuals to ascertain when birds
retwned after being flushed.
The mean number of redheads, ruddy ducks, mallards and
gadwalls on the test pond declined after disturbance regardless
of agent. Mallards flew from the pond during a disturbance
and did not return during the following hour. Gadwalls also
flew from the pond during a disturbance, but returned to the
pond during the following hour. Since birds were not
marked, it could not be determined if the same individuals
returned.
American avocet numbers remained constant or
increased slight.ly as other avocets landed in the pond after
the disturbance. Avocets typically ignored the disturbance

counted immediately after a disturbance in 1984 decreased to
almost zero, but returned to pre-disturbance levels within 15
minutes (Table 2). Coots swam out of sight into hardstem
bulrush stands (where they could not be counted) when
disturbed. They remained hidden during the disturbance and
began returning to open water after the disturbance ceased.
Disturbances did not affect number of coots counted in
1985 (Tables 2 and 3). The difference between 1984 and
1985 count data was the result of coot behavior. In 1985,
coots over 20 m from the disturbance swam from view and
hid as they did in 1984. Coots in hardstem bulrush stands
along the trail (before the disturbance) flushed into the open
when disturbed. The intensity of coot responses was
independent of the agent of disturbance (X 2 = 3.3, 0.25 &lt; P
&lt; 0.50) (Fig.2).
Redhead-The number of redheads counted immediately after disturbances decreased from pre-disturbance counts
in 1984 and 1985 (Tables 2 and 3). During four trials
redheads flew from the area or hid in hardstem bulrush. In
these trials, redheads did not return to pre-disturbance activity
(where they could be counted) during the following hour. In
one trial, the number of redheads counted was unaffected by
disturbance. Response values of redheads were independent of
the agent of disturbance (X 2 = 2.15, 0.25 &lt; P &lt; 0.50) (Fig.

3).

Ruddy Duck-The number of ruddy ducks counted on
wetlands
after a disturbance decreased from pre-disturbance
\
levels in 1984 (Table 2). When disturbed, ruddy ducks dove
into the water and probably resurfaced in the hardstem
bulrush where they could not be counted. They began
returning to open water during the hour after the disturbance.
In 1985, the number of ruddy ducks decreased after the
disturbance in all trials and did not return to pre-disturbance
levels except in one case (Tables 2 and 3). Small sample
size precluded statistical testing.
Mallard-Mallards responded to disturbance by flying
from the wetland and not returning during the hour
following the disturbance in most Lrials (Tables 2 and 3).
The post-disturbance number returned to pre-disturbance
levels within one hour in three trials in 1985. Small sample
size precluded statistical testing.
Gadwall-The mean number of gadwalls counted in
the test area decreased immediately after a disturbance in 13
of the 20 trials (Tables 2 and 3). In most trials, the number
of gadwalls returned to pre-disturbance levels within one
hour. There was no difference in gadwall responses to the
two disturbance agents (X 2 = 3.22, 0.50 &lt; P &lt; 0.75) (Fig.
4).

used.

American A vocet-Neither agent of disturbance had
an effect on American avocets (Tables 2 and 3). Response
values were low and did not depend on disturbance agent (X2
= 1.18, 0.50 &lt; P &lt; 0.75) (Fig. 5).

American coots and diving ducks (redheads and ruddy
ducks) temporarily hid in the bulrush or dove in response to
disturbance. American coot numbers returned to pre-

54

�A
70

A

(13)

60
(11)

so -

':'.:-»:

50
40 -

40

30 -

30

&gt;z

Ili'il :

20 -

20

0

(6)

(5)

10

&gt;-

(1)

w

!!!!

10 -

0

zw

::)

aw

0 - - 4 - -....., _

::)

a:

aw

8

LL

a:

(8)

50

50 -

Itf
··········

(6)

111!1
:-:❖:•:

I

40 -

1

1

=~t~=~=

ll!i!I!
.• •.
:::::::::

1

~11~1-..----.2

(5)

(4)

li

1

20 -

~ --'--~
' ~ ) '------L!!-1111~!
0

1

(7)

30 ::

111111

8

LL

60

:

i _ _,,_--"-t:..:l=i:_

_.__,i-J--___._,_m
.,..
l\f.....

1

111!.

3

Q

4

{{:

--L...-..,..
l -----.:.;,...._
1 ____._-'-'-,l~ -....I -......L:;;.;,;.
l :..L..-

Q

RESPONSE VALUE

1

2

3

4

RESPONSE VALUE

Figure 2. Frequency of American coot responses to
(A) a person on foot and (B) in a motor vehicle
during disturbance trials in 1985.

Figure 3. Frequency of redhead responses to (A) a
person on foot and (B) in a motor vehicle during
disturbance trials in 1985.

55

�A
A
(9)

50
60
40

(7)

50

30

::
20
&gt;()
z

Jil:::::::::

20
!_I.I.I.I.

1

10

ii

&gt;-

10
(1)
1!111!1
( )
0 -+--~-.a..:.:.;.;"'----'-'-..,__.___,_.:.:,.;.:.&amp;_.&amp;.:.:.,:.~

()

z

w
:::&gt;

LU

:::,

aLU

(5)

aUJ

8

cc

a:

LL

LL

8
80
70

(7}

ii

I
(1)

10
:{lll:
0 _.___....._r-L-___.""'r-'------,.---.------L~10
2
1
3
4

2

0

1

2

3

4

RESPONSE VALUE

0

:

(::.:_:·2:_·.:i·:_ :__:::::::::·:

RESPONSE VALUE

Figure 4. Frequency of gadwall _-responses to (A) a
person on foot and (8) in a motor vehicle during
disturbance trials in 1985.

Figure 5.
Frequency of American avocet responses
to (A) a person on foot and (B) in a motor vehicle
during disturbance trials in 1985. ·

56

�Table 2. Marsh birds on a wetland immediately before, after, and at 15-minute intervals for one hour after
disturbance by a person walking.
n present
Species
Year

Post-disturbance (min.)

n counts

After disturbance

15

30

45

60

3-29
16
15.3
10.5

0-2
0
0.5
0.8

4-23
17.5
14.8
7.6

2-40
22.5
21.8
12.9

6-31
26.5
23.3
9.3

3-36
26.5
23.0
10.9

5-22
10.5
11.6
5.0

5-20
10.0
11.4
3.4

2-18
8.5
9.4
4.5

3-26
9.0
10.3
6.0

4-21
10.5
11.7
5.3

4-25
11.6
5.9

1-5
3.0
2.8
1.5

0-3
0.0
1.0
1.4

0-1
1.0
0.8
0.5

0-4
2.0
1.8
1.5

0-6
1.0
2.4
2.9

0-5
1.0
2.0
2.0

2-17
7.0
7.5
4_4 ·

0-14
6.0
6.6
4.4

0-11
6.0
5.5
4.0

0-13
3.0
4.8
4.7

0-13
6.0
6.4
4.7

0-16
3.0
4.8
4.9

1-12
2.0
4.4
4.0

0-2
1.0
1.0
1.0

2-12
3.0
4.7
3.7

2-10
3.0
4.4
3.0

0-7
4.0
3.7
2.5

0-10
2.0
2.7
3.4

1-4
1.0
1.8
1.5

0-1
0.0
0.3
0.5

0
0.0
0.0

0
0.0
0.0

0-3
0.5
1.0
1.4

0-6

1-11
9.0
7.5
4.7

0-2
0.5
0.8
1.0

0-3
1.0
1.3
1.3

0-3
0.5
1.0
1.4

0-3
1.0
1.3
1.5

0-4
1.0
1.5
1.7

1-5
2.0
2.3
1.1

0-2
0.0
0.6
0.9

0-2
0.0
0.3
0.7

0-1
0.0
0.4
0.5

0-2
0.0
0.8
1.0

0-2
0.0

1-10
5.0
5.3
3.0

0-6
2.0
2.7
2.5

0-8
2.0
2.7
3.0

0-8
1.0
2.2
3.1

0-12
3.0
4.2
3.8

0-9
2.0
3.3
3.6

1-4
2.0
2.3
1.1

0-4
2.0
2.1
1.1

0-5
2.0
1.9
1.4

0-6
2.0
2.2
1.7

0-4
2.0
1.9
1.2

0-8
2.5
2.9
2.5

Before disturbance

American coot

1984

6

Range
Median

i
SD

1985

16

Range
Median

i
SD
Redhead

1984

5

Range
Median

i
SD

1985

21

Range
Median

i
SD
Ruddy duck

1984

7

Range
Median

i
SD

1985

4

Range
Median

i
SD
Mallard

1984
i
SD

9

Range
Median

i
SD
Gadwall

1985
i
SD
American avocet
Range
Median

i
SD

0.6

0.7

IO

Range
Median

1985

0.0
1.5
3.0

4

Range
Median

1985

9.5

12

57

�...
Table 3. Marsh birds on a wetland immediately before, after, and at 15-minute intervals for one hour after
disturbance by a motor vehicle, 1985.
n present
Before disturbance
American coot
Range
Median

Range

Median

i
SD

3-17
9.0
9.5
3.9

4-15
8.0
8.6
3.7

3-16
10.0
9.1
3.9

3-19
8.0
8.5
4.4

3-18
8.0
8.6
4.7

2-12
7.0
7.2
3.6

0-14
7.0
7.0

5.5

0-11
7.0
6.1
4.0

0-12
4.0
4.9
4.4

0-12
3.0
4.9
4.5

0-12
4.0
4.5
4.2

1-3
2.0
2.0
1.4

0
0.0
0.0

0
0.0
0.0

0
0.0
0.0

0
0.0
0.0

0
0.0
0.0

1-13
7.0
7.0
8.5

1-6
3.5
3.5
3.5

0-6
3.0
3.0
4.2

2-5
3.5
3.5
2.1

2-4
3.0
3.0
1.4

3-4
3.5
3.5
0.7

1-8
3 .5
3.4
2.0

0-9
2.0
2.1
2.8

0-3
1.0
1.1
1.2

0-5
1.0
1.5
1.8

0-6
3.0
2.9
2.4

0-7
2.0
2.4
2.6

1-5
3/0
3 .1
1.5

1-4
2.0
2.4
1.3

0-5
2.0
2.4
1.7

0-6
2.0
2.1
2.2

0-5

0-14

3.0
2.6
1. 7

3.0
4.3

10

i
SD
American avocet

4-18
9.0
9.1
3.5

2

i
SD
Gadwall
Range
Median

60

2

i
SD
Mallard
Range
Median

Post-disturbance (min.)
30
45

13

i
SD
Ruddy duck
Range
Median

15

14

i
SD
Redhead
Range
Median

After disturbance

7

4.7

birds to human disturbance should be periodically measured
to learn if habituation occurs with increased exposure to
human activities. Natural resource managers, when planning
wildlife viewing opponunities in wetlands, should consider
that the intensity of responses of waterbirds to recreationrelated disturbance will vary among species and agents of
disturbance .

disturbance levels within one hour. In 1984, the mean
number of coots on the test pond one hour after a
disturbance exceeded the pre-disturbance number. This can be
explained by blind placement. Blind placement in 1984
did not allow birds to be counted in a small area near the
dike along which the disturbance occurred. During many
trials, coots were obscured from view prior to disturbance.
When disturbed, they swam across the pond and were
counted. They did not return to the original area during the
following hour. Blind placement the following year allowed
all birds on the pond outside of the bulrush area to be
counted.

LITERATURE CITED
Aney, W. W., and C. D. Cowan. 1975. Survey shows wildlife
important recrca1ional resource. Oregon Wild!. 30(2):8-9.
Arthur, L. M. 1979. The aesthetic value of wildlife: perceptions
of the American public and sportsmen. Pages 32-34 in T.
C. Daniel, E. H. Zube, and B. L. Driver, eds. Accessing
amenity resource values. U.S. Dep. Agric., For. Serv. Gen.
Tech. Rep. RM-68.
Belli, L. A. 1977. Survey of nonconsumptive wildlife users in
Idaho. M.S. Thesis. Univ. Idaho, Moscow. 110 pp.
Royle, S. A., and F. B. Samson. Nonconsumptive outdoor
recreation; an annotated bibliography of human wildlife
interactions. U.S. Dep. Imer., Fish and Wild!. Serv. Spec.
Sci. Rep. 252. 113 pp.

MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
Managers planning for visitors at wetlands should
identify the species present and their potential responses to
visitor-induced disturbance. Disturbance trials proved to be
useful for measuring species responses. -Viewing from motor
vehicles would cause less disturbance to wildlife while
restricting visitors to designated routes. Responses of water-

58

�Fazio, J. R., and L. A. Belli. 1977. Characteristics of
nonconsumptive wildlife users in Idaho. Trans. Norlh Am.
Wildl. and Nat. Resour. Conf. 42:117-128.
Gray, G. C. 1975. Nonconsumptive demand for wildlife by
municipal conservation commissioners in Massachusetts.
M.S. Thesis, Univ. Massachusells, Amherst. 94 pp.
More, T. A. 1979. The demand for nonconsumptive wildlife
users: a review of the literature. U.S. Dep. Agric., For.
Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-52. 16 pp.
Profera, J. 1984. Development of sage grouse public viewing
tours, North Park, Colorado. Colorado Div. Wildl., Wildl.
Res. Rep. 2:373-386.
Schultz, R. D., and J. A. Bailey. 1978. Responses of
national park elk to human activity. J. Wild!. Manage.
42:91-100.
Shaw, W. W., D. J. Willer, D. A. King, and M. T. Richards.

1978. Nonhunting wildlife enthusiasts and wildlife
management. Proc. West. Assoc. Fish and Wildl. Agencies
58:255-263.
Tyre, G. L., and G. A. James. 1971. Length and rate of
individual participation in various activities on recreation
sites and areas. U.S. Dep. Agric., For. Serv. Res. Note. SE161. 4 pp.
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1978. Climates of the United
States. Gales Res. Co., Detroit, Mich. 606 pp.
U.S. Department of Interior. 1982. 1980 National survey of
fishing, hunting and wildlife-associated recreation. U.S.
Dep. Inter., Fish and Wild!. Serv., ·Washington D.C. 156
pp.
Yeosting, D. R .• and D. L. Burkhead. 1973. Significance of
childhood recreation experience on adult leisure behavior:
an exploratory analysis. J. Leisure Res. 5:25-36.

59

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="2">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="479">
                <text>Journal Articles</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7018">
                <text>CPW peer-reviewed journal publications</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="4354">
              <text>Response of waterbirds to experimental disturbances</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="41">
          <name>Description</name>
          <description>An account of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="4355">
              <text>&lt;p&gt;Responses of waterbirds to experimental disturbances were studied from April 1984 to August 1985 at Russell Lakes State Wildlife Area in the San Luis Valley, Colorado. Black-crowned night-herons (&lt;em&gt;Nycticorax nycticorax&lt;/em&gt;), snowy egrets (&lt;em&gt;Egretta thula&lt;/em&gt;) and white-faced ibis (&lt;em&gt;Plegadis chihi&lt;/em&gt;) were approached directly by a person on foot or in a motor vehicle. Mean (±SD) flushing distances for these species were 153±66, 93±43, and 95±48 m when approached on foot and 47±26, 57±27, and 54±27 m when approached in a motor vehicle. Reactions of American coots (&lt;em&gt;Fulica americana&lt;/em&gt;), redheads (&lt;em&gt;Aythya americana&lt;/em&gt;), ruddy ducks (&lt;em&gt;O ura jamaicensis&lt;/em&gt;), mallards (&lt;em&gt;Anas platyrhynchos&lt;/em&gt;), gadwalls (&lt;em&gt;A. strepera&lt;/em&gt;) and American avocets (&lt;em&gt;Recurviroslra americana&lt;/em&gt;) to disturbance were also quantified. Intensity of response was independent of agent of disturbances (i.e., person on foot or in vehicle) for all species. Disturbance reduced species diversity and abundance for up to one hour. American coots and avocets were only minimally impacted by the disturbance agents used.&lt;/p&gt;</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="80">
          <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
          <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="4356">
              <text>George, J. L., C. E. Braun, R. A. Ryder, and E. Decker. 1991. Response of waterbirds to experimental disturbances. Proceedings V. Issues and Technology in the Management of Impacted Wildlife 5:52–59.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="39">
          <name>Creator</name>
          <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="4357">
              <text>George, Janet L. </text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="4358">
              <text>Braun, Clait E.</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="4359">
              <text>Ryder, Ronald A.</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="4360">
              <text>Decker, Eugene</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="4361">
              <text>American avocet</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="4362">
              <text>American coot</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="4363">
              <text>Black-crowned night-heron</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="4364">
              <text>Colorado</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="4365">
              <text>Disturbance</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="4366">
              <text>Gadwall</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="4367">
              <text>Mallard</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="4368">
              <text>Recreation</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="4369">
              <text>Redhead</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="4370">
              <text>Ruddy duck</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="4371">
              <text>Snowy egret</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="4372">
              <text>Waterbirds</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="4373">
              <text>White-faced ibis</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="78">
          <name>Extent</name>
          <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="4374">
              <text>8 pages</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="56">
          <name>Date Created</name>
          <description>Date of creation of the resource.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="4375">
              <text>1991</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="4376">
              <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"&gt;In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted&lt;/a&gt;</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="42">
          <name>Format</name>
          <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="4378">
              <text>application/pdf</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="4379">
              <text>English</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="70">
          <name>Is Part Of</name>
          <description>A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="4380">
              <text>Issues and technology in the management of impacted wildlife : proceedings of a national symposium, Snowmass Resort, Colorado, April 8-10, 1991</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7089">
              <text>Article</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
