Evaluating noninvasive methods for estimating cestode prevalence in a wild carnivore population
Item Metadata
Dublin Core
Title
Evaluating noninvasive methods for estimating cestode prevalence in a wild carnivore population
Description
Helminth infections are cryptic and can be difficult to study in wildlife species. Helminth research in wildlife hosts has historically required invasive animal handling and necropsy, while results from noninvasive parasite research, like scat analysis, may not be possible at the helminth species or individual host levels. To increase the utility of noninvasive sampling, individual hosts can be identified by applying molecular methods. This allows for longitudinal sampling of known hosts and can be paired with individual-level covariates. Here we evaluate a combination of methods and existing long-term monitoring data to identify patterns of cestode infections in gray wolves in Yellowstone National Park. Our goals were: (1) Identify the species and apparent prevalence of cestodes infecting Yellowstone wolves; (2) Assess the relationships between wolf biological and social characteristics and cestode infections; (3) Examine how wolf samples were affected by environmental conditions with respect to the success of individual genotyping. We collected over 200 wolf scats from 2018–2020 and conducted laboratory analyses including individual wolf genotyping, sex identification, cestode identification, and fecal glucocorticoid measurements. Wolf genotyping success rate was 45%, which was higher in the winter but decreased with higher precipitation and as more time elapsed between scat deposit and collection. One cestode species was detected in 28% of all fecal samples, and 38% of known individuals. The most common infection was Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato (primarily E. canadensis). Adult wolves had 4x greater odds of having a cestode infection than pups, as well as wolves sampled in the winter. Our methods provide an alternative approach to estimate cestode prevalence and to linking parasites to known individuals in a wild host system, but may be most useful when employed in existing study systems and when field collections are designed to minimize the time between fecal deposition and collection.
Bibliographic Citation
Brandell, E. E., M. K. Jackson, P. C. Cross, A. J. Piaggio, D. R. Taylor, D. W. Smith, B. Boufana, D. R. Stahler, and P. J. Hudson. 2022. Evaluating noninvasive methods for estimating cestode prevalence in a wild carnivore population. PLoS ONE 17(11): e0277420; doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277420
Creator
Brandell, Ellen E.
Jackson, Madeline K.
Cross, Paul C.
Piaggio, Antoinette J.
Taylor, Daniel R.
Smith, Douglas W.
Boufana, Belgees
Stahler, Daniel R.
Hudson, Peter J.
Subject
Wolf
Genotyping
Cestode infection
Extent
19 pages
Rights
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/
Type
Article
Format
application/pdf
Language
English
Is Part Of
Plos one
Date Issued
11/15/2022
Date Modified
10/26/2022
Date Submitted
4/7/2022
Collection
Citation
Brandell, Ellen E. et al., “Evaluating noninvasive methods for estimating cestode prevalence in a wild carnivore population,” CPW Digital Collections, accessed December 21, 2024, https://cpw.cvlcollections.org/items/show/379.