<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="507" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://cpw.cvlcollections.org/items/show/507?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-06-05T05:34:29+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="942">
      <src>https://cpw.cvlcollections.org/files/original/92d7137cb5f0aee3659f54488bdd2c7d.pdf</src>
      <authentication>28b7830f38d58eed59e4e8c0c4b05a6c</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="92">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="8040">
                  <text>C O L O R A D O

P A R K S

&amp;

W I L D L I F E

Fish Passage at River Structures
RESEARCH AND DESIGN GUIDELINES

Introduction
Instream structures, such as culverts, water diversions and dams, can negatively affect fish by
fragmenting populations, reducing migratory ranges, and limiting access to habitat for spawning, feeding and refugia.
Many rivers in Colorado contain man-made structures that create partial (obstacles) or complete barriers depending on
the fish species and life stage. Habitat fragmentation associated with instream barriers is a serious threat to Colorado’s
Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) and sport
fisheries. Therefore, it is important that fisheries managers
(A)
identify and evaluate the influence of instream structures on
fish populations.

Fish Passage Research Objectives
The primary goal of fish passage research is to restore
connectivity in fragmented river systems by: (1) evaluating the
effectiveness of existing fishways; (2) evaluating the barrierpotential of common river structures; and (3) establishing fish
swim performance criteria for native and sport fishes.

Current Fish Passage Research Projects
Active fish passage research projects include: (1) evaluation of
native fish passage at existing fishways located on Front Range
transition zone streams; (2) evaluation of fish passage at
instream whitewater park structures; (3) laboratory studies to
develop fish swim and jump performance criteria for Colorado
fishes where data is lacking; and (4) development of new
techniques and technologies for investigating fish movement
and passage in rivers.

(B)

Fishway Design
Fishways, or “fish ladders”, are engineered structures
designed to facilitate passage around an obstacle or barrier.
Fishways attempt to incorporate species- and life stagespecific swimming and jumping abilities into designs. Common
elements of successful fishways include: (1) low velocity
pathways that do not exceed burst speeds or endurance
capabilities for target species (Figure A); (2) water depths that
do not limit swimming performance (Figure B); (3) vertical
drops that do not exceed the jumping ability for target species
- note that many species native to Colorado do not exhibit
jumping behaviors (Figure C); (4) sufficient attraction flow, or
the flow that emanates from a fishway entrance, to ensure
that fish can locate the fishway; and (5) maintenance of the
above design elements over the expected range of
streamflows.

(C)

COLORADO PARKS &amp; WILDLIFE • 1313 Sherman St., Denver, CO 80203 • (303) 297-1192 • cpw.state.co.us

�Fishway Examples
Some examples of successful fishways include engineered rock ramps (Figure D), constructed riffles (Figure E), and
vertical slot fishways (Figure F). Each type of fishway has advantages and disadvantages related to which fish species
and life stages are present and the conditions of the project site.

Engineered Rock Ramp

Constructed Riffle

Vertical Slot

Diversion Crest

Piney Creek,
Wyoming

Fossil Creek Reservoir
Inlet Diversion,
Cache la Poudre River

(D)

Rock Weirs

CCC Ditch,
San Miguel River

(E)

(F)

Aquatic Habitat Types
From the high-gradient, boulder-dominated, step-pool
channels of snowmelt fed mountain streams to the lowgradient, well-vegetated, pool-riffle rivers of the eastern
plains to the majestic, vertically-confined canyons on the
arid Colorado Plateau, aquatic habitats in Colorado are as
diverse as the geographic regions where they are found.
Native Colorado fishes have unique morphological
characteristics that are adapted to the natural conditions
found in each aquatic habitat type. These adaptations affect
the swimming abilities of fish, influencing how they move
through and use diverse habitats. Fisheries managers must
take the diversity of fish species into consideration when
evaluating river structures and designing fishways.

Fish Swimming Performance by Family
Family Name
Percidae (Perches)

SGCN (#)

Fundulidae (Topminnows)
Cottidae (Sculpin)
Ictaluridae (Catfish)
Cyprinidae (Minnows)
Catostomidae (Suckers)
Centrarchidae (Sunfish)

All illustrations of fish © Joseph R. Tomelleri

3

Prolonged Speed (ft/s)
0.4 - 1.2

Burst Speed (ft/s)
NA - 2.4

Jump Height (ft)
0*

Habitat Types
EP

1
0
1
13
5
1

1.3 - 1.6
1.4 - 1.7
1.3 - 2.0
1.3 - 2.4
1.3 - 2.5
1.1 - 2.9

2.6 - 3.4
3.3 - 3.9
2.0 - NA
2.4 - 4.4
2.2 - 3.2
2.6 - NA

0.1 - 0.2
0*
NA - 0.2
0* - 0.5
NA - 0.8
0.4 - NA

EP
CP, MS
EP, TZ
CP, EP, MS, RG, TZ
CP, EP, MS, RG, TZ
EP

Salmonidae (Trout)
3
2.3 - 4.0
4.5 - 7.5
1.0 - 7.0
MS, RG, TZ
SGCN = Species of Greatest Conservation Need, # of species/subspecies; * = fish species does not exhibit jumping behavior; NA =
data were not available; CP = Colorado Plateau, EP = Eastern Plains, MS = Mountain Streams, RG = Rio Grande; TZ = Transition Zone

The values reported above are summarized from multiple species within each family and are intended to support passage
for juvenile life stages. Swim speeds and jumping abilities within species are size dependent. Species-specific performance
criteria should be used whenever possible. The selection of target species for individual projects should be based on the
management objectives for the site in question. Consultation with the local Area Aquatic Biologist at CPW is strongly
encouraged during the early planning stages for any fish passage project in Colorado. The information in this fact sheet is
based on the best available data and knowledge, but is subject to revision as more information becomes available.
COLORADO PARKS &amp; WILDLIFE • 1313 Sherman St., Denver, CO 80203 • (303) 297-1192 • cpw.state.co.us

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="20">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7200">
                <text>Fact Sheets</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7201">
                <text>Fact Sheet</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7202">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7210">
                <text>CPW Fact Sheets</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8041">
              <text>Fish Passage at River Structures Fact Sheet</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8042">
              <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-NC/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Only&lt;/a&gt;</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
