<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="55" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://cpw.cvlcollections.org/items/show/55?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-06-04T22:47:32+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="61">
      <src>https://cpw.cvlcollections.org/files/original/e81e19bd9473ce123290a1da6400c5a3.pdf</src>
      <authentication>d3ee00e4a2669be88995b59701af160e</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="92">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="610">
                  <text>The research in this publication was partially or fully funded by Colorado Parks and Wildlife.

Dan Prenzlow, Director, Colorado Parks and Wildlife • Parks and Wildlife Commission: Marvin McDaniel, Chair • Carrie Besnette Hauser, Vice-Chair
Marie Haskett, Secretary • Taishya Adams • Betsy Blecha • Charles Garcia • Dallas May • Duke Phillips, IV • Luke B. Schafer • James Jay Tutchton • Eden Vardy

�Asynchronous vegetation phenology enhances winter body condition of a large mobile
herbivore
Author(s): Kate R. Searle, Mindy B. Rice, Charles R. Anderson, Chad Bishop and N. T.
Hobbs
Source: Oecologia , October 2015, Vol. 179, No. 2 (October 2015), pp. 377-391
Published by: Springer in cooperation with International Association for Ecology
Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43671670
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms &amp; Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms

Springer and are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Oecologia

This content downloaded from
45.130.83.192 on Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:24:26 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�Oecologia (2015) 179:377-391

DOI 10. 1 007/s00442-01 5-3348-9 IQI CrossMark
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Asynchronous vegetation phenology enhances winter body
condition of a large mobile herbivore
Kate R. Searle1 ■ Mindy B. Rice2 * Charles R. Anderson2 ■ Chad Bishop2 ■ N. T. Hobbs3

Received: 27 May 2014 / Accepted: 3 May 2015 / Published online: 26 May 2015
© Springer- Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Abstract Understanding how spatial and temporal
hetAdditionally,
the influence of vegetation phenology on
erogeneity influence ecological processes forms
central
body a
fat
was much stronger than that of overall vegetation
challenge in ecology. Individual responses toproductivity.
heterogeneity
In summary, changing annual weather patshape population dynamics, therefore understanding
these in relation to seasonal precipitation, have
terns, particularly
responses is central to sustainable population
management.
the
potential to alter body condition of this important unguEmerging evidence has shown that herbivores
track
heterolate
species
during the critical winter period. This finding
geneity in nutritional quality of vegetation by
responding
to
highlights
the importance
of maintaining large contigu-

phenological differences in plants. We quantified
the
ous areas
of benspatially and temporally variable resources to
efits mule deer ( Odocoileus hemionus ) accrue
from
accessallow
animals
to compensate behaviourally for changing
ing habitats with asynchronous plant phenology
climate-driven
in northresource patterns.

west Colorado over 3 years. Our analysis examined both
the direct physiological and indirect environmental
effects
Keywords
Mule deer • Spatial heterogeneity • Temporal

of weather and vegetation phenology on mule
deer winter
heterogeneity
• Western Colorado • Climate change
body condition. We identified several important effects of

annual weather patterns and topographical variables on
vegetation phenology in the home rangesIntroduction
of mule deer.
Crucially, temporal patterns of vegetation phenology were
linked with differences in body condition, with
deer climatic
tend- patterns are altering the phenology
Changing
ing to show poorer body condition in areas of
with
less taxa
asyndiverse
and the resources on which they depend
chronous vegetation green-up and later vegetation
onset.
around the
globe (Parmesan 2007; Thackeray et al. 2010;
The direct physiological effect of previous winter
Haenel precipitaand Tielboerger 2015). For large-bodied herbi-

tion on mule deer body condition was muchvores,
less important
the phenology of vegetation is a critical determinant
than the indirect effect mediated by vegetation
of diet
phenology.
quality (Van Soest 1994; Crawley 1983) that has

been linked to diet choice, individual movement and per-

formance (Hjeljord et al. 1990; Albon and Langvatn 1992;
Herfindal et al. 2006; Hebblewhite et al. 2008; Mysterud
Communicated by Göran C. Ericsson.
et al. 2008; Hamel et al. 2009; Martinez-Jauregui et al.
I SI Kate R. Searle
2009; Bischof et al. 2012; Nielsen et al. 2012; Singh
katrle@ceh.ac.uk
et al. 2012; Giroux et al. 2014; Monteith et al. 2014), as
well as population processes such as survival, reproduc1 NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bush Estate,
Penicuik EH26 0QB, UK
tion and density dependence (Mysterud et al. 2002; Wang
2 Colorado Parks and Wildlife, 3 17 W. Prospect Road, Fort et al. 2006; Pettorelli et al. 2007; Wittemyer et al. 2007;
Collins, CO 80526, USA
Middleton et al. 2013). The ability of landscapes to sup3 Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability,
Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80524, CO, USA

port herbivores is ultimately limited by the total amount of

aboveground net primary production (ANPP) available for
Ô Springer

This content downloaded from
45.130.83.192 on Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:24:26 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�378

Oecologia

consumption
tigue
ture,

2004).

(2015)

(McNaughton
et
landscapes with the winter body condition
of adult al.
female

However,
when
spatial
mule deer to facilitate
understanding
of how changing

nutrients,

pulses

of

179:377-391

or
moisture
results
weather
patterns may affect this important
species. Weather

198

var
in

s

plant

growth
(Kudo
he
has important direct and
indirect effects on1991),
ungulate conperiod
they h
dition. during
Harsh winters with largewhich
snowpacks exert a direct

prolong

the

of

nutritional
value.
ev
physiological
effect on ungulateEmerging
body condition (Catchpole
et al. 2000;
Pettorelli modified
et al. 2005a, c), and also an indirect
by ANPP
are
by the

peak

limits

set

timing

of

plant

growth.
In and
particular,
effect via vegetation phenology
abundance (Albon and

t

in Langvatn
plant
ex
1992; Cote communities
and Festa-Bianchet 2001; Pettorelli
heterogeneity
that
et al. 2003, 2005a, c, 2006, 2007;
Mysterud et induces
al. 2008;

heterogeneity
particularly
influencing
tant

plant Hamel
phenology,
offers
et al. 2009; Nielsen et al. 2012; Mysterud
and Aus-

fu

benefits
foraging
trheim 2014). We exploredto
these direct
and indirect effects

he

nutritional

the

performance using
of
individuals
and th
hierarchical
Bayesian structural equation modelling
torelli et al. 2007;
Hebblewhite
et
to link
variation in weather and vegetation phenology
withal. 20
2008; Searle et al. 2010; Middleton et al. 2013; Giroux
winter condition of adult mule deer in Northwest Colorado,
et al. 2014; Hurley 2014; Iversen 2014). For instance, fine-

USA. Using this framework, we developed hypotheses that

scale dynamics of vegetation green-up across landscapes first related annual weather conditions and topography with
may determine the length of time during spring when high- vegetation phenology in the annual home ranges of mule

quality forage is available for ungulates. This means that

deer, linking the onset and rate of vegetation green-up in

access to heterogeneity can be a critically important feature of habitats for mobile herbivores (Owen-Smith 2004;

the spring with seasonal temperature, rainfall and elevation.

Fryxell et al. 2005; Hobbs et al. 2008; Searle et al. 2010). If

warmer spring temperatures would have earlier onset to

We expected that home ranges at lower elevations and with

access to heterogeneity is limited by habitat fragmentation, vegetation green-up. Additionally, we expected that home
mobile herbivores can suffer a reduction in diet quality and ranges with higher winter and spring precipitation would

food availability leading to deleterious changes to popula-

have later vegetation onset in the spring as well as steeper

tion dynamics and abundance (Hobbs et al. 2008; Hobbs slopes of vegetation green-up. We did not look for direct
and Gordon 2010; Searle et al. 2010; Blackburn et al. 201 1; effects of spring weather on subsequent body condition
Herbener et al. 2012). These interactions between access during winter because previous work has shown for a range
to spatial and temporal heterogeneity and ungulate perfor-

of ungulates that effects of weather during spring and sum-

mance will mediate the response of ungulate populations to

mer are more likely to be mediated through their effects on

vegetation (e.g. Pettorelli et al. 2005a, c; Mysterud et al.
ing oil and gas development) and climate change. There- 2008). As such, we felt that these additional pathways

environmental change, such as changing land use (includ-

fore, understanding the underlying mechanisms and drivers would have over-parameterised the model.

of these interactions is of great importance for informed

We then considered hypotheses pertaining to how win-

management of ungulate populations and the changing eco-

ter body condition of individual deer is influenced by the

systems in which they reside.

temporal pattern of vegetation onset and green-up during

Large herbivores such as mule deer ( Odocoileus hemionus ) have profound impacts on ecosystem structure and

function (Hobbs 1996; Manier and Hobbs 2007; Fornara
and Du Toit 2008; Beschta and Ripple 2009; Goheen et al.
2010; Allred et al. 2011; Gass and Binkley 2011; Nkwabi
et al. 2011; Bai et al. 2012), and understanding the ways

spring and early summer (4 April-25 June). More specifically, we predicted that individuals inhabiting home ranges

with shallower vegetation green-up slopes (slower aggregate rate of vegetation green-up) would experience elongated periods when the vegetation is at peak quality, and
that this benefit would accrue during the spring and carry

in which their behaviour, individual performance and popu- over to winter months resulting in better subsequent winter

lation dynamics are likely to change under future climate body condition for these individuals in comparison to those
scenarios is crucial for effective management of ecosysinhabiting home ranges with steeper vegetation greentems. The condition of ungulates in winter is an important

up slopes (Pettorelli et al. 2005c; Lendrum 2013; Hurley

determinant of future fitness because of its impact on indi- 2014). We also predicted that individuals inhabiting home

vidual body condition at the start of the breeding season

ranges with an earlier vegetation onset [i.e. a higher value

(Forchhammer et al. 2001; Steinheim et al. 2002; Solberg of the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) in
et al. 2007; Rodriguez-Hidalgo et al. 2010; Taillon et al. early spring] would have higher winter body condition than
2012; Hurley 2014). In this paper, we mechanistically link

individuals occupying home ranges with a later vegetation

changes in annual weather patterns and variation in the onset (Pettorelli et al. 2005c). This is because individuspatial and temporal patterns of plant phenology across als in home ranges with earlier vegetation onset will have
Ö Springer

This content downloaded from
45.130.83.192 on Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:24:26 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�Oecologia

(2015)

179:377-391

379

a

prolonged
period
of
access
to
fora
of independent
variables
(weather, topography,
vegetation
value
(Pettorelli
eton dependent
al.
2007),
phenology)
variables (winter body there
condition)
accrue
benefits (Shipley
over
afour
longer
time
2002). The
mule deer population
segments
body
condition in
the
this study following
occupy adjacent winter range areaswinte
(Fig. 1),
terms,

with

would
pying

We
tion

we

expected
that
but each segment
has distinct individuals
seasonal movement patterns.

higher

forage
productivity
The North Ridge
and North Magnolia population segments (in
better
winter
con
migrate east
to west, while the Ryanbody
Gulch and South Maghome
ranges
lower
forag
nolia groupswith
migrate north to
south, averaging approxihave

formalised
predictions
matelythese
40 km between seasonal
ranges. Winter ranges are
phenology

and
mule
deer
wint
primarily
distinct,
but there is some
overlap within
eastern

three
hypotheses,
each
represente
and southern summer
ranges. This
population does, thereconfronted
with
fore, provide
3 an years
opportunity to examine
of
the effects
data
of seat
evidence:
sonal variation in vegetation phenology on winter body
condition of ungulates. The adjacencies of each population
(a) Individuals inhabiting home ranges with earlier onset segment's winter range means that individuals experience
of vegetation emergence have higher winter body con-comparatively similar winter conditions (Fig. 1); however,
dition than those individuals inhabiting home ranges the migratory behaviour of each segment results in geowith later vegetation onset.

graphically distinct seasonal ranges in the spring and sum-

(b) Individuals occupying home ranges with more asynmer. As such, the distinct seasonal migratory patterns and
chronous vegetation green-up have better winter body
convergent winter ranges for individuals within this popu-

condition than individuals occupying home ranges
lation allow us to look for an effect of the temporal patwith faster, more synchronous vegetation green-up.

tern of vegetation phenology on body condition in a large,
(c) Individuals inhabiting home ranges with greater vege-mobile herbivore.
tation productivity will have higher winter body condi-

tion than individuals inhabiting homes ranges of lowerStudy area
productivity.

This study took place in the Piceance Basin located in
More locally, numbers of mule deer in western Coloradonorthwest Colorado, USA, during 2009, 2010 and 2011

declined in the late 1980s up until the early 2000s (White (Fig. 1). The Piceance Basin supports one of the larg-

and Lubow 2002; Bergman et al. 2011). Whilst population
est migratory populations of mule deer in North America
(White and Lubow 2002), and contains a diverse mix of
numbers have since begun to increase in the region, populations remain low such that the Piceance regional popula-pinion pine ( Pinus edulis)-Utah juniper (Juniperus oste tion currently represents about half of historic highs from
osperma ) woodland, sagebrush ( Artemesia spp)-steppe

the late 1970s-early 1980s [from Colorado Parks and Wild-community, Gambel's oak ( Quercus gùmòe///)-mountain
life (CPW) quadrat mark-resight survey data; C. Anderson,
shrub complex, quaking aspen ( Populus tremuloides)unpublished data]. Therefore, better understanding of theDouglas fir (. Pseudotsuga menziesii) forest, and Englelong-term climatic, annual weather patterns and resourcemann spruce (Picea engelmannii)-s'jibd'pmQ fir (Abies
drivers of these population trends is critical for conserving
lasiocarpa) forest (Lendrum et al. 2014). The region typithis important species.

cally experiences warm, dry summers (28 °C mean high)

and cold winters (-12 °C mean low), with most of the
annual moisture deriving from spring snowmelt (Western
Materials and methods

Regional Climate Center, 1983-2010). We observed four
wintering mule deer population segments in the Piceance

To explore the direct and indirect effects of weatherBasin:
and the North Ridge segment (53 km2), just north of the
vegetation phenology on mule deer winter body condition
Dry Fork of Piceance Creek including the White River in

we implemented hierarchical Bayesian structural equathe northeastern portion of the basin; the Ryan Gulch segtion modelling using data from 153 adult female mule
ment (141 km2), between Ryan Gulch and Dry Gulch in the
deer across four segments of a single winter range popusouthwestern portion of the basin; the North Magnolia seglation over the period 2009-201 1 in Northwest Colorado.
ment (79 km2), between the Dry Fork of Piceance Creek
Structural equation modelling is well suited to this analyand Lee Gulch in the north-central portion of the basin; and

sis because it allows a series of hypothesized cause
theand
South Magnolia segment (83 km2), between Lee Gulch
effect relationships to be captured within a single model,
and Piceance Creek in the south-central portion of the basin
which estimates the magnitude of direct and indirect effects
(Fig. 1).

Springer

This content downloaded from
45.130.83.192 on Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:24:26 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�380
Fig.
the

Oecologia
1

Study

four

(2015)

area

containing

population

segments

the
Colorado
Piceance
mule
deer
population

Deer

capture

179:377-391

of

region

Table
each

1

of

Number
the

3

of

years

de

of

o

We
employed
helicopter
net-gunnin
Year
Population
segm
et
al.
1982;
van
Reenen
1982)
to
cap
between

early

North

Magnolia

December

and

Sou

early

2009
9
9
16
15
study
areas
over
3
consecutive
ye
2010 17 19 18 19
Capture
and
handling
procedures
2011 and
10
15
6
0
CPW
Animal
Care
Use
Comm
tity
15-2008).
In
each
year
of
stu
individuals
were
ture
myopathies
(includes
any
mo
vation,
therefore
capture)
were
two
(December
2009
analysis
one
(December
2010),
andrepresen
zero
(Ma

Ô Springer

This content downloaded from
45.130.83.192 on Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:24:26 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�Oecologia

(2015)

179:377-391

381

deer were hobbled and blindfolded. Adult females were

Assessing each individual deer's body condition, movetransported to localized handling sites for recording body
ments, and MCP with the previous year's weather varimeasurements and fitted with global positioning system
ables is supported by the high fidelity of deer to seasonal

(GPS) collars (five or 24 fixes/day; G2110D, Advanced
ranges (Kufeld et al. 1989; Brown 1992; Nicholson et al.
Telemetry Systems, Isanti, MN) and released. GPS collars
1997). Females in this population of mule deer have occuwere supplied with timed drop-off mechanisms scheduled
pied identical seasonal ranges over multiple years (Garrott
to release early in April of the year following deployment.
et al. 1987). This fidelity to home ranges allows us to relate

All radio-collars were equipped with mortality-sensing
annual weather patterns and forage conditions derived
options (i.e. increased pulse rate following 4-8 h of inacfrom movement patterns observed subsequent to the meastivity). All captures were made during the winter for urement
each
of winter body condition with a fair degree of
year of study, with capture dates ranging from December
certainty.
to March.

Plant phenology
Body condition and age
We applied ultrasonography techniques described by Stephenson et al. (1998, 2002) and Cook et al. (2001) to meas-

We used the NDVI as a proxy for vegetation phenology
(greenness), which has been used extensively as a surrogate for vegetation productivity and dynamics (Pettorelli

ure maximum subcutaneous rump fat (millimetres), loin et al. 2005b; Boone et al. 2006; Morisette et al. 2006; Petdepth (longissimus dorsi muscle, millimetres), and to esti- torelli et al. 2006; Bellis et al. 2008; Pettorelli et al. 2011).
mate percent body fat for each individual. We estimated a Data were collected from the Global Land Cover Facility
body condition score (BCS) for each deer by palpating the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)
rump (Cook et al. 2001, 2007, 2010). Percent body fat was

16-day composite imagery (NASA 2000-2011). MODIS

then estimated using a regression equation that incorporated rump fat measurements and BCS (Cook et al. 2007,
2010). Age of individuals was estimated based on tooth
replacement and wear (Severinghaus 1949; Hamlin et al.
2000).

uses NASA's Terra and Aqua satellites with 16-day orbits,
a 2330-km swath, and a 250-m resolution. The NDVI is
a ratio of red and near infrared reflectance using bands 1

and 2 of the MODIS sensors [NDVI = (NIR - RED)/
(NIR + RED) where NIR is the near-infrared light reflected
by vegetation, and RED is the red visible light reflected by

Home range calculations

vegetation]. NDVI values range from -0.25 to 1 where
negative values indicate sparse green vegetation. For each

We downloaded and summarized data from GPS collars

year of observation, we created several different indices
for the buffers of individual deer from the satellite-derived
deployed following collar drop and retrieval in early April
NDVI
of the next year. GPS collars deployed maintained
themeasurements:

same fix schedule of attempting fixes every 5 h. For each

individual deer, a minimum convex polygon (MCP)Onset
was of vegetation emergence
placed around their GPS locations for each year using the

Geospatial Modelling Environment (version 0.5.3 Beta;
The mean value of NDVI for each individual's buffer per
Hawthorne L. Beyer 2009-2011 http://www.spatialecolyear is on 4 April. This date was determined by visual
ogy.com). Movement paths were then created betweeninspection
each
of mean NDVI curves for all individuals in each

subsequent location for each deer and the average moveyear to capture the start of the green-up period (sensu Pettorelli et al. 2007; Mysterud et al. 2008). Home ranges with
this distance was applied to each deer's MCP and all spahigher NDVI values on this date are expected to have expe-

ment distance was calculated for that deer. A buffer of
tial data described were extracted for each deer's buffered

rienced earlier onset to vegetation growth.

MCP, hereafter called 'buffer'. We did not separate GPS
locations by season because transition from winter to sumSlope of NDVI during vegetation green-up

mer range typically occurs rapidly in this population (C.
Anderson, unpublished data). We therefore felt that using
The slope between the mean NDVI values (termed 'slope')
was measured at defined dates for each individual's buffer.
all GPS locations for the entire year (December/March

to April) resulted in the best representation of the yearly
The dates defining the start and end of the green-up period
home range use of each individual, capturing both winter
were determined visually from plots of mean NDVI curves
and summer ranges. We did not attempt to separate winter
for all individuals in each year. After visual inspection of

or summer ranges because we were interested in the comNDVI curves, we defined the green-up period as occurbined effect of weather and vegetation over the entire year.
ring between 4 April and 25 June, and this date range was
Ô Springer

This content downloaded from
45.130.83.192 on Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:24:26 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�382

Oecologia

(2015)

179:377-391

Analysis
used
for
all
individuals
in
the
ana
the
speed
of
vegetation
green-up
To examine evidence for our hypotheses we
used structural
elongated
or
compressed
is
the
phen
equation
modelling
to
examine
links
between
variation
in
of
plants
in
each
individual's
home
body condition
fat) of adult female mule
2007;
Mysterud winter
et
al.(percent
2008)?
We
also
deer in slope
northwestern Colorado,
plant phenology indices
mum
increase
in
during
the
g
and weather. We used
hierarchical structural equation
modture
any
deviations
from
a
linear
in
els within
the Bayesian framework
because this approachshort
green-up
such
as
very
rapid,
f
can be used to examine
both the direct (physiological) and
torelli
et
al.
2007).
However,
resul
indirect
(via plant phenology) effects
of weather on ungu- the
were
similar
to
those
from
sl
cussed
further.
late body condition, whilst considering predictor variables
of

from multiple scales (yearly measurements of weather and

Integrated
The
ing
of
ric

of

tions for
likelihoods.
the
sum
of
the
values
Based onbuffer
our understanding of the per
system we surmised
individual's
15
im

INDVI
an

vegetation phenology, and individual variation between
NDVI
animals), and allowing flexibility in the choice of distribuis

a mechanistic model for how weather
and plant phenolpreceding
body
fat
m
ogy used
directly and indirectly
affect
individual winter body
commonly
to
estimate
pr

observation
is

grazing

Weather

condition of mule deer. The
model quantified the direct
ecosystems
(Pettorelli
effects of weather and topography on vegetation phenol-

and

et

ogy (with units of years), the direct effects ofvariable
plant phenoltopographic

ogy (defined by the NDVI indices outlined above) on mule
Weather data were collected from the PRISM climate

deer winter body condition (with units of individuals), the

direct
group using their parameter-elevation relationships
on effects of annual weather variation on mule deer
winter body condition, and the indirect effects of weather,
independent slopes model (PRISM) data sets of precipi-

via plant phenology, on mule deer winter body condition
tation, minimum temperature, and maximum temperature
(Fig. 2). These relationships were structured to account for
layers (Daly 1997). The resolution for all weather varivariation
ables was 4 km. Both precipitation and temperature
data at the individual level due to animal characteristics
(age at capture, population segment). We then fit the
were obtained from the year prior to when deer body condition data were collected (e.g. if an individual wasmodel
cap- to observations spread over 3 years (2009, 2010,
tured and measured in December 2010, then climate data
2011) from the four distinct population segments (Table 1;
from 2009 was used).
Fig. 1). Linear relationships were used throughout. We used
fixed effects to account for variation amongst the 3 years
Using this data we calculated the sum of precipitation
of study,
the age of the deer, the period of capture (early
over the green-up period (beginning of April to end
of
or the
late winter), and the population segment to which each
June, hereafter referred to as 'spring precipitation'), and
individual belonged. Capture dates in February and March
sum of precipitation over the previous winter (beginning
of January to end of March, hereafter referred to as were
'win-classed as a single 'late winter' category because captures generally occurred in late February or early March.
ter precipitation'). We also calculated the mean maximum
Captures
in December are classified as 'early winter'.
temperature over the green-up period (beginning of April
to
Structural equation modelling requires hypothesizend of June, hereafter referred to as 'spring temperature').
causal inferential paths and testing the significance of
Elevation and aspect were collected from the US ing
Geo-

logical Survey digital elevation model with a 30-m these
reso-paths both directly and indirectly through a mediating
lution. Elevation units were in metres, and aspect variable
used (vegetation phenology; Fig. 2). To implement this
model within a hierarchical Bayesian framework, we specidegree categories based on the following: north (0-22.5),
fied three separate model parts: data models for percent fat
northeast (22.5-67.5), east (67.5-112.5), southeast (112.5and NDVI metrics, process models for linking weather,
157.5), south (157.5-202.5), southwest (202.5-247.5),
west (247.5-292.5), northwest (292.5-337.5), and north topography, vegetation phenology and body condition, and
prior distributions of parameters.
(337.5-360).
All data were resampled in ArcGIS to the broadest reso-

The data model is the likelihood linking the data to the

lution corresponding to the weather variables at 4 km. Tem- model parameters. We have two data models, one link-

perature, precipitation, elevation, slope, and NDVI were ing observations of NDVI metrics to weather and topoextracted using spatial analyst in Arc GIS for each individ-

graphic variables, and one linking observations of percent

ual deer's buffer.

body fat to plant phenology (NDVI metrics) and animal

Ô Springer

This content downloaded from
45.130.83.192 on Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:24:26 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�Oecologia
Fig.

2

(2015)

179:377-391

383

equation
Spring I Elevation
| | Aspect I Winter | Spring

Structural

model
diagram
for
how
condiprecipitation!
temperature
tion
[percent
body
fat
(PF)
during
winter]
of
mule
deer
is
affected

by

directly

weather

and

and

indirectly

plant

phenology

in northwest Colorado. NDVI

ifiyjj indices r /

Normalised difference vegetation index

I

Age

^

condition

HB
characteristics (age at capture, capture period, population).
site, is a fixed effect accounting for variation derived from
NDVI metrics were logit transformed and percent body
fat
the four
distinct mule deer population segments used in the
were entered as percentages, such that:

log it (NDVI/¿) ~ normal (/zNDVI¿¿, &lt;xndvi)
and

PF itt ~ normal (/xPF¿¿, app)

analysis.

The second part of the process model gives the probability of the model prediction for percent fat for
the ith deer in the rth year, /¿PF,p given the respective process model parameters, and the residual variance estimate for unaccounted variation in the mod-

where NDVI/ ř is the observation for the NDVI metric for

elled percent fat process and measurement error, app :

the ith deer in the tih year, /iNDVli t is the model predic-

P(/¿PF¿¿|c, dk, age¿, year,, capture_month;, crpp) , where
c is the regression intercept, dk are the kth regression coefficients for the effects of phenology and weather on body

tion for the NDVI metric for the ith deer in the rth year,
and orNDVI is the residual variance across all observations of
the NDVI metric not explained by weather or topography.
Observations for the body condition (percent fat) for the ith

fat, and age,, year, and capture_monthř are fixed effects
accounting for variation due to age of individual deer, the

deer in the rth year are denoted by PF, ř, residual variance

year of observation and the period in which individuals

not explained by the model is denoted as aPF, and /¿PF it is

were caught for body fat measurements. These probabili-

the model prediction for the percent fat of the ith deer in the

ties are defined by two structural path equations: firstly for

ith year. Observations of percent fat for individual deer are

each NDVI metric (Eq. 1) and secondly for each percent fat
measurement (Eq. 2):

assumed to be independent in this analysis. If captures of
individuals tended to target persistent social groups of deer

this assumption may be invalid; however, previous work
in this area has shown that statistical dependence between
survival rates of sibling neonates using the same landscape
was minor (C. Bishop, unpublished data). This suggests the

/¿NDVIi&gt;r = a + &amp;ispringppt¿ , + i^winterppt,- 1

+ &amp;3springtempíř + &amp;4elev/¿

-h fcsaspect,-, + site[populationř] (l)

assumption of independence is warranted for individuals in

/¿PF ¡J = c + difjiNDWlij + ¿2 winterppt; ř + d^gtļ

our study area.

The process component of the model relates the model
predictions for NDVI metrics and percent fat to the param-

+ yr[year,] + cm[capturemonthř] (2)

eters of the model. As such, it derives the probability of the

Because our analysis is fully Bayesian, we specify

model prediction for each NDVI metric for the ith deer in

prior distributions for all model parameters in the hierar-

the rth year, /¿NDVI, ř, given the respective process model
parameters, and the residual variance estimate for unac-

were standardised, therefore all prior distributions were

counted variation in the modelled NDVI process or measurement error, ok dví : P(/iNDVI,-t/|fl, bk, site/, otndvi)»
where a is the regression intercept, bk are the kth regression coefficients for weather and topographical effects, and

chy. All input variables (weather, topography and age)
assumed to be normally distributed and uninformative
[all parameters ~ normal (0, 1.0E- 6)]. Because the data
for NDVI indices were logit transformed, these were also

assumed to be normally distributed, and uninformative
Springer

This content downloaded from
45.130.83.192 on Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:24:26 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�384

Fig.

Oecologia

3

Mean

(2015)

179:377-391

NDVI 4curves
forthe
each
stud
April) and
end
of

Magnolia, b North of
Ridge,
c Ryan Gulch,
the green-up
period
line represents NDVI
for
an individual
d
each
individual's
annua
as the sum from
of the mean NDVI values
over 5March
March to 31
NDVI values were calculated
used
5
to
of observation (2009,
2011), tick
October for2010
each individual's and
annual home range
intervals, and arrows show vegetation 'on

diffuse gamma priors were used for the inverse of the
interval &lt; 1.05). All model residuals were normally distribresidual variances of the NDVI model and percent fat
uted (Pearson x2 normality test, onset P = 19.45, p = 0.08;
slope P = 16.51, p = 0.17; INDVI P = 19.06, p = 0.09).
model, ctndvi, aPF ~ gamma (0.001, 0.001). All models
were fit using WinBUGS (Spiegelhalter 1999) softwareWinter body fat measurements varied between 3.0 and
and a Markov chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) procedure for
18.3 % across all individuals and years of study. Mean pereach model run for 10,000 iterations after an initial burncent fat measurements were approximately similar across
in of 10,000 iterations to ensure convergence of all model
the 3 years of observation (2009, 7.0 %, SD 1.5; 2010,

parameters. Convergence diagnostics and autocorrelation
6.9 %, SD 1.5; 2011, 9.1 %, SD 4.0). Body fat measurestatistics were used to assess the mixing of three MCMC
ments across the four study areas were also similar; highest
chains per model, and to assess the MCMC sampling qualbody fat measurements were recorded in North Magnolia

ity for each parameter. Prior to running each model(mean
on
8.0 %, SD 2.6), followed by South Magnolia (mean
actual data, models were tested on realistically simulated
7.7, SD 3.0), North Ridge (mean 7.3, SD 2.0), and Ryan
data to test their ability to converge on reasonable paramGulch (mean 6.6, SD 1.4). Vegetation phenology followed
eter estimates. All models performed well in simulations,
similar patterns across the four study areas (Fig. 3), with
converging on known parameter estimates such that 95 the
% green-up period commencing around 4 April and reachcredible intervals for each parameter contained the true,
ing a plateau around 25 June. As expected, deer caught in
known value.

late winter had significantly lower body fat estimates than

those caught in early winter (Table 2). In all analyses, age
of deer tended to be negatively correlated with body condiResults

tion (greater than 75-85 % of the posterior density mass
was negative; Table 2).

All models converged satisfactorily on posterior distribuOnset
tions for model parameters. All posterior distributions were

approximately normal, and autocorrelation in the MCMC

chains was not a factor after the initial burn-in period
The onset model explained approximately 36 % of the vari(Gelman diagnostics for MCMC chains upper credibleation in body condition measurements and approximately
&lt;£) Springer

This content downloaded from
45.130.83.192 on Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:24:26 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�Oecologia
Table 2
etation

(2015)

179:377-391

Posterior density
index (. INDVI)

Slope

385

estimates

Onset

for

para

INDVI

a (intercept) -1.01 (-1.08, -0.94) -0.94 (-0.98, -0.91) 5.88 (5.79, 5.97)

bx (spring ppt.) 0.12 (0.015, 0.22)* 0.073 (0.022, 0.13)* -0.1 1 (-0.25, 0.030)
b2 (winter ppt.) 0.21 (0.13, 0.29)* 0.037 (-0.0040, 0.076) 0.22 (0.1 1, 0.33)*
£3 (spring temp.) -0.26 (-0.36,-0.16)* -0.13 (-0.18, -0.081)* -0.10 (-0.24, 0.033)
bA (elevation) 0.21 (0.13, 0.30)* 0.072 (0.030, 0.1 1)* 0.15 (0.044, 0.27)*

b5 (aspect) -0.072 (-0.14, 0.0014) -0.068 (-0.1 1, -0.031)* 0.10 (0.0041, 0.20)*
c (intercept) 11.94 (10.09, 13.78) 12.77 (10.75, 14.8) 10.62 (-1.17, 21.48)

dx (phenology) -0.82 (-2.25, 0.54) 0.67 (-0.99, 2.27) 0.28 (- 1 .53, 2.24)
d2 (winter ppt.) 0.38 (-0.23, 1.01) 0.0083 (-0.38, 0.39) -0.026 (-0.67, 0.63)
d3 (age) -0.18 (-0.50, 0.14) -0.19 (-0.52, 0.14) -0.19 (-0.52, 0.14)
Residual variance (percent fat model) 3.90 (3.14, 4.97) 3.92 (3.16, 5.00) 3.93 (3.16, 5.01)
Residual variance (phenology model) 0.19(0.15,0.24) 0.048(0.039,0.060) 0.33(0.0.26,0.41)
Year fixed effect on percent fat [2] -0.69 (-1.90, 0.51) [2] 0.18 (-0.90, 0.1.24) [2] -0.15 (-0.89, 0.60)
[3] -1.29 (-2.69, 0.10) [3] -0.86 (-2.25, 0.51) [3] -1.04 (-2.36, 0.28)

Population segment fixed effect on percent fat [2] -0.49 (-1 .42, 0.0.46) [2] -0.42 (- 1 .37, 0.55) [2] -0.42 (-1 .38, 0.58)
[3] -0.93 (-0. 1 .96, 0.084) [3] -0.77 (- 1 .75, 0. 19) [3] -0.63 (- 1 .73, 0.43)
[4] -0.40 (-1.31, 0.50) [4] -0.27 (-1.17, 0.62) [4] -0.26 (-1.17, 0.62)

Capture period fixed effect -4.93 (-6.37, -3.53)* -4.89 (-6.34, -3.48)* -4.85 (-6.32, -3.43)*

Estimates are mean posterior densities with 95 % credible intervals. Fixed effects for different years of study are c
and 3 = 201 1), and for population segment are compared to North Magnolia, with 2 = North Ridge, 3 = Ryan Gulch
ppt. Precipitation, temp, temperature
* P &lt; 0.05

63 % of the variation in NDVI metrics. Precipitation over (greater than 75 % of the posterior density mass was positive, Table 2; Fig. 4a), suggesting that deer inhabiting home
the green-up period (spring precipitation) had a strong
positive relationship with the mean NDVI value dur- ranges with earlier vegetation onset tended to have better
body condition.
ing the initial phase of vegetation green-up (4 April), as

did elevation (Table 2; greater than 95 % of the posterior
density was less than zero). Therefore, home ranges with Slope
higher spring precipitation, or those at higher elevations,
The slope model explained approximately 36 % of the varihad significantly earlier onset to vegetation growth. There
was also an indication that precipitation during the previ-ation in body condition measurements and approximately
67 % of the variation in NDVI metrics. Precipitation durous winter (winter precipitation) resulted in earlier onset of
vegetation (Table 2; more than 75 % of the posterior den- ing the previous winter (winter precipitation) and over the
sity mass was greater than zero). Mean temperature dur- green-up period (spring precipitation) had a strong positive
relationship with the mean slope of vegetation green-up,
ing green-up (spring temperature) had a strong negative
relationship with mean NDVI values on 4 April (Table 2;as did elevation (Table 2; more than 95 % of the posterior
more than 95 % of the posterior density mass was greaterdensity mass was greater than zero). Mean temperature
than zero) meaning that annual home ranges experiencingduring green-up (spring temperature) had a strong negawarmer spring temperatures had significantly later onset totive relationship with the mean slope of vegetation greenup (Table 2; greater than 95 % of the posterior density
vegetation growth. Aspect also had a strongly negative relamass was less than zero). Aspect tended to be negatively
tionship with mean NDVI values on 4 April, indicating that
home ranges with more southerly or westerly aspects hadrelated to mean slope of vegetation green-up (greater than
75 % of the posterior density mass was negative; Table 2),
later vegetation onset values than those with more northerly
or eastern aspects (Table 2; more than 95 % of the posteriorindicating that home ranges with more southerly or westerly aspects tended to have slower rates of vegetation
density mass was greater than zero).
green-up in the spring. Previous winter precipitation tended
There was weak evidence for a positive relationship
between onset of vegetation green-up and body condition to be positively related to body condition (greater than
Springer

This content downloaded from
45.130.83.192 on Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:24:26 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�386
Fig.

Oecologia
4

(2015)

Structural
a

179:377-391

equation

model diagram for how condition (percent body fat during
winter) of adult, female mule

Spring

precipitation

1

V

deer is affected directly and
indirectly by weather and veg-

etation

phenology

(ow'°"S

in

northwest

/

Colorado in 2008, 2009 and
2010. Indirect linkages
are
+0.07^^^

ļ

^^^

(0.022,0.13) X / ļ

manifested through a measure
of vegetation greenness in the
spring derived from NDVI
measurements (a onset of / /

T Onset jfJ

vegetation,

green-up,

b

c

mean

slope
+0.67

INDVI).

/of
+0.0083

Thick

solid
(-0.99,2.27) j (-0.38,0.39)

/
lines represent strong evidence
for an effect (95 % credible
interval does not
overlap
zero),
____
Mule deer body
while thin solid Age
lines
represent
I

weak

evidence

for

an

effect

(-0.52,0.14) (percent fat)

(95 % credible interval marginally includes zero). Dotted
lines represent
no clear effect.
b
Regression coefficient estimates
are given with 95 % credible
intervals. Plus
sign
Predicted
precipitation
V
positive relationship, minus sign
predicted negative relationship

Spring Elevation | Aspect Winter Spring
^ +0.2l' (-0.14,0.0014) +0*2Ī // - -

(0.13,0.30)' (0.13,0.29^y ^^)26

/ / ^^M-0.36,-0.16)

(0.015,0.22^^^ X /
^ļMean slop e|*y

-0.82 / +0.38

(-2.25,0.54) / (-0.23,1.01)

Age I

(-0.50,0.14) (percent fat)
c

Spring | Elevation | | Aspect | Winter Spring
precipitation

V

' X (0.0041,0.20) +0 22 / ! /

' {0.iïÙK X ' (0.0041,0.20)
^/¡ +0 22 / / X" /
' / / (-0.24,0.033)
INDVI Yļ

' !

+0.28 I / -0.026
(-1.53,2.24)1 J (-0.67,0.63)
I /

,

Age I

(-0.52,0.14) (percent fat)

40 Springer

This content downloaded from
45.130.83.192 on Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:24:26 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�Oecologia
75

%

of

There

179:377-391

387

of plant growth
in the spring through enhanced
soil water
posterior
density
mass
was
availability.
Whilst
there
were
indications
of
a
similar
relaa strong indication of a ne

the

was

between
tion

(2015)

tionship
between
the onset of vegetation emergence
and
slope
of
vegetation
green-u
winter
precipitation,
the strength
of thisposterio
relationship was
than
87
% of
the
as clear. This
is probablyindicating
due to the contrasting actions th
Table 2; not
Fig.
4b),

the

(greater

negative;
home

ranges

poorer
with

increased soil moisture
availability acting to encourwith offaster
vegetation
gree

age vegetation growth,
whilst remaining
winterinhabi
snowpack
condition
than
deer
would act to inhibit earlier
growth (e.g. Christianson etgree
al.
asynchronous
vegetation

body

more

2013). The speed of vegetation green-up increased in home

Integrated

ranges experiencing higher winter and spring precipitaNDVI
tion, and in those located at higher elevations. This effect

is consistent
with results from other
rangeland systems,
The INDVI model
explained
approxim
and iscondition
likely due to a greater flush of measurem
available moisture for
variation in body
mately
during

30

%

the

plant growth
in the spring, thereby
accelerating
green-up
the
variation
in
NDVI

m

Christianson
et al. 2013).
Home ranges
with higher
(Table2007;
2;
more
than
95
% of
precipitation
had significantly
greater productivity
greater winter
than
zero),
and
both s
(INDVI), probably because
the greater moisture
availabilspring temperature
during
the
gree

with

INDVI

mass

was

and

of

of vegetation
(Walker et al.had
1993, 1995;a
Bjork
and Molau
previous
winter
strong

enhances vegetation growth
throughout
the spring, and
to be negatively ityrelated
to
INDVI
(gr
potentially the summer
if snowmeltwas
continues into
the midthe posterior density
mass
negat
dle part ofhad
the year (Walker
et al. 1993, 1995;
Bjork and
tion and aspect both
strong
positiv
Molau 2007). than 95 % of th
INDVI (Table 2; more

mass

was

greater

Home ranges with
higher mean temperature
during spring
than
zero),
indicating

had significantly
later onset
of vegetation growth, inaspect
contrast
with more southerly
or
westerly
results from other
regions (e.g. Pettorelli
et al. 2005c).
values than those towith
more
northerly
Higher temperatures
during the spring
period may actof
to
(Table 2). We found
no clear
effect
w

or

INDVI

on

or reduce onset of vegetation (Table
growth if they reduce
the Fi
bodydelay
condition
2;
moisture available for plant growth, particularly in moun-

tainous semi-arid regions such as the Piceance Basin. Home
Discussion

ranges with higher mean temperatures during spring had
shallower slopes of vegetation green-up, which is also in

contrast to previous studies (e.g. Pettorelli et al. 2007; CampIn this study, we demonstrate a tangible link between
bell et al. 2013; Middleton et al. 2013). It is possible that
the temporal pattern of vegetation phenology and unguwarmer spring temperatures resulted in later fulfillment of
late body condition during the critical winter period for
chilling requirements for some plant species (Yu et al. 2010;
a migratory mule deer population. Moreover, we identify
Paudel
key variation in annual weather patterns that determine
the and Andersen 2013). However, the applicability of

this mechanism to our study system has yet to be evaluated
onset and synchrony of vegetation green-up in this region.
in the context of warming spring temperatures.
Importantly, we demonstrate that the migratory strategies

Home ranges with more southerly or westerly aspects
displayed by different segments of a contiguous overwinhad greater INDVI values than those with more northerly
tering population appear to influence the resulting perforeasterly aspects, again probably because of the ameliomance of individuals, with variation in the synchrony,or
and
rated microclimatic conditions for plant growth afforded
to a lesser extent, the onset of vegetation within seasonal
these slopes. The significant positive effect of elevation
home ranges contributing to subsequent winter body by
con-

on INDVI is expected in our study area because areas of
dition. Moreover, we show that this variation in vegetation
higher elevation utilized in the summer have greater vegphenology is a more important driver of subsequent winter
etation productivity over the year than those occupying
body condition than total forage availability, when measured using remotely sensed data.

Weather, topography and vegetation phenology

lower elevations.

Vegetation phenology and ungulate winter body
condition

Precipitation in the spring resulted in significantly earlier
Our findings indicate that deer inhabiting home ranges with
onset to vegetation growth, presumably because greater
earlier vegetation onset tended to have better winter body
precipitation during this period facilitates the initiation
&lt;0 Springer

This content downloaded from
45.130.83.192 on Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:24:26 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�388

Oecologia

(2015)

179:377-391

that inhabiting
of
overall hom
vege
those
total
m
This
is productivity
because
a
high
grassland
systems
to
the
start
of
the
green-up
period
is
t
of
individuals
and
t
with
an
earlier
start
to
the
growing

condition

etation

time
is

in

period
line

mule
al.

components
which
forage appear
is
at
pe
tio-temporal
previous
work pattern
on
the
Characteristics
of individual animals werewhich
found to be
this
region,
d

at

with

deer

in

relatively
important'surfed'
determinants of winter bodythe
condition.
than
gr
Across all analyses, on
the age of deer
tended to summer
be negatively
arriving
the
correlated of
with bodyforage
condition indicating that,occurs
as expected,
productivity

'jumped'
et

than

onset.

rather

2012),

peak
As
such,

older animals tended
to have poorer body condition
than
individuals
utilising
summ
animals. However,
we detected little support
for
lier
vegetation younger
onset
would
experi
a direct effect of previous
winter precipitation
on percentthe
match
between
their
arrival
and

body fat in any of thestudies
analyses, indicating that during
the
quality
forage.
Other
have
d
study period the direct,(May)
physiological impact NDVI
of previous
effect
of
early
season
o
winter precipitation
was less important than the indirect
(domestic
sheep)
in
autumn
acros
weather effects on et
body condition
mediated
through plant
in
Norway
(Nielsen
al.
2012),
as

phenology. It may be that mule deer inreindeer
this region were
free-ranging
able to compensate for declines in et
body condition
result(Ballesteros
al.
2013

body
mass
in
etation
onset

et

al.

cies
is

a

ing from previous
winter positive
precipitation over the course of
found
no
eff

(2007)

onset

the subsequent
spring and summer;
without
juvenile
growth
orhowever,
survival
repeated northern
body condition measurements of individuals
over
Canada
and
Italy,
an

on

in

greater

of

access

of

the

to

multiple years we are
unable the
to test this assumption.
In
influence
of
average
addition, winter conditions during
this study period were
high-quality
forage,
rat

average

relatively mild, and in severe
winters
we would expect this
timing
of
vegetation

direct physiological effectthat
to be much stronger.
Studies ineff
findings
suggest
the
boreal forests with strong
seasonality at northern latitudes
differs
between
ungulate
life
have
found
summer
fattening
of
ungulates
linked
to
plant
Importantly,
we
found
evidence

these
onset

home

phenology
to be a more important factor
for body condiwith
steeper,
and
there
tion in autumn than
winter body mass loss to
due to harsh
green-up
tended
have
conditions (snow homes
depth and temperature) ranges
(Mysterud et al.
occupying
w

ranges

vegetation
than

deer

vegetation

2008). Although body
mass of yearling red
deer ( Cervus
green-up.
Rapid
changes

elaphus)
in Norway was
linked to winter snow and to
temcould
translate
gr
found that the magnitude
of these effects
pointperature,
init was
time
across
a
lan
was much smaller
than the indirect
effects of climate
oper-com
rapid
changes
may
also
serve
to
ating
through
plants
(Mysterud
et
al.
2008).
Similarly,
in
over
which
high-quality
forage
is

tation

at

a

green-up

given

over

a

our study area,
we detected no clearsuch
effect of previousas
winspatial
scale,
th
ter precipitation
on percent
body fat of mule deer, whilst
depressing
diet
quality
over

tially
torelli
of

large

et

al.

effects of previous
spring precipitation and temperature
on
2007;
Middleton
et

vegetation

body fat, mediated through
plant phenology, has
were much
during
spring

with

growth

clearer.survival
and

sis

growth

of

),

mountain

of

al.

bee

bighorn

goat

kids

Conclusion
in
Canada,
survival
of
Alpine
ibex
northern
Italy
(Pettorelli
et
al.
2
findings warrant increased attention
to the com-am
recruitment
andOurpregnancy
rates
plexities arising from
changing
climatic
patterns in this
the
USA
(Middleton
et
al.
2013).
En
region. Although
increased
spring andshown
winter precipitanology
rates
have
also
been
t

tion resulted in earlier onset of
vegetation growth, they (C
body
mass
in
Eurasian
beavers
also acted to simultaneously
compress vegetation
green-up
There
is
mounting
evidence
that
t
thereby potentially negatively phenolo
affecting the body
nism
whereby periods
vegetation
of mule
deer through a compression
of the time
many
importantcondition
life
history
aspects

period over
which high-quality forage isof
available.both
Howthe
influence
ever,
winter
precipitation
also
had
a
strong
positive
impact
green-up
on
body
fat
w

Interestingly,
the

slope

of

Springer

This content downloaded from
45.130.83.192 on Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:24:26 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�Oecologia

on

(2015)

overall

efit

large

2003).
ture

179:377-391

389

Bureau productivity,
of Land Managem
vegetation

their cooperation. Finally
(Owen-Smith 1990
on statistical analysis.

herbivores

The

interplay

between

precipit

will

ultimately determine vegetati
References
dynamics in this system.
This highlight
ter understanding of the complexity an
weather

of

and

future

Albon SD, Langvatn R
(1992) Plant phenology and the benefits
of
vegetation
dynamics
for

climate

pr

migration in a temperate ungulate. Oikos 65:502-513
change,
particularly

Allred BW, Fuhlendorf SD, Engle DM, Elmore RD (2011) Ungulate

regions with highly
seasonal environme
preference for burned patches reveals strength of fire-grazing
ies such as this, which
facilitate
mechan
interaction. Ecol Evol
1:132-144
annual
mate
ing
We

variation

change,

this

Bai Y, Wu
J, Clark CM, Pan Q, Zhang patterns
L, Chen S, Wang Q, Han X
in
weather

will

an

(2012) Grazing alters ecosystem functioning and C:N:P stoichibe
an important com
ometry of grasslands along a regional precipitation gradient. J

knowledge
gap.
Appi Ecol 49:1204-1215

have

empirically
demonstrated
Barrett MW, Nolan
JW, Roy LD (1982) Evaluation of a hand-held imp

net-gun to capture large
mammals. Wildl Soc Bull 10:108-114
ships between temporal
patterns
of veg
LM, Pidgeon AM, Radeloff VC,in
St-Louis V,
Navarro JL, Marand winter body Bellis
condition
this
ungu

ever,

tella MB (2008) Modeling habitat suitability for greater rheas

the

weather

complexity
of
the
e
based on satellite
image
texture. Ecoldiffering
Appi 18:1956-1966
patterns Bergman
onEJ,the
various
compo
Watkins BE, Bishop
CJ, Lukacs PM, Lloyd
M (2011)

Biological and in
socio-economic
effects of statewide quality
limitation of
cally driven variation
forage
deer licenses in Colorado. J Wildl Manage 75(6): 1443-1452
rants further research
to better elucidat

nisms.

Our

Beschta RL, Ripple WJ (2009) Large predators and trophic cascades

results

demonstrate

the

nece

in terrestrial ecosystems of the western United States. Biol Con-

142:2401-2414
sufficient areas ofservspatially
and tempor
Bischof
R, Loe LE, Meisingset
EL, Zimmermannherbivo
B, Van Moorter
resources to allow
mobile
large

compensate
The

for

emerging

B, Mysterud A (2012) A migratory northern ungulate in the
changing
climate and
pursuit of spring: jumping or surfing the green wave? Am Nat

body
of
180:407-424

evidence

demons

ungulates will actively
track
Bjork RG, Molau U
(2007) Ecology ofphenologic
alpine snowbeds and the
of global change.
Arct Antarct Alp warrant
Res 39:34-43
etation to enhance impact
diet
quality

HB, Hobbs NT, Detling JK (2011) Nonlinear responses to
and protection ofBlackburn
sufficiently
large are
food availability shape effects of habitat fragmentation on conhabitat to conserve
large
herbivores
an
sumers. Ecology 92:98-107

in

ecosystems

across
the
globe.
Boone RB, Thirgood
SJ, Hopcraft
JGC (2006) Serengeti wildebeest
migratory patterns modeled from rainfall and new vegetation

Author
N.

T.

H.

growth. Ecology
87:1987-1994
contribution
statement

framework.
conducted
the
and

K.

R.

Brown CG (1992) Movement and migration patterns of mule deer in
concéived, southeastern
designed
and
Idaho. J Wildl Manage
56:246-253 conduc

the

C.

B.
and
R.
conce
Campbell
RD, NewmanC.
C, Macdonald
DW,A.
Roseli F (2013)
Proximateexperiments.
weather patterns and spring green-up phenology
effect Eurfield
All
aut

interpretation
manuscript

asian beaver ( Castor fiber ) body mass and reproductive success:
of data and analysis,
the implications of climate change and topography. Glob Chang

preparation.
Biol 19:1311-1324

Catchpole EA, Morgan BJT, Coulson TN, Freeman SN, Albon SD
(2000) Factors influencing Soay sheep survival. J R Stat Soc Ser

C Appiwish
Stat 49:453-472to thank D. Bil
Acknowledgments We
Cebrian J, Lartigue
J (2004) Patterns of herbivory
and decomposition
Bergman for insightful
comments
on
this m
in aquatic and terrestrial
Ecol Monogr
74:237-259
was funded and supported
by ecosystems.
CPW.
This
pro
Christiansonresearch
D, Klaver RW, Middleton
AD, Kauffman MJ (2013)
both mammal and avian
sections
of

winterwho
and spring phenoclimatology
on large herbiM. Michaels fromConfounded
CPW
administered
ranges.
Landsc Ecol
28:427-437
were supported vore
in
part
by
an award from
Cook RC, Cook JG, Murray
Zager P, Johnson BK, Gratson
MW
Foundation (DEB 0444711)
to DL,
Colorado
State
(2001) Development
of predictive models of for
nutritional field
condially, we thank numerous
technicians
tion for rocky Air
mountain elk.
J Wildl Manage
65:973-987
tion. We thank Quicksilver
for
assistance
i

and

Hobbs

Cook RC, Stephenson
TR, Myers
Cook JG, Shipleyfor
LA (2007) f
helicopters and L. Gepfert
and
L. WL,
Coulter
Validating
predictive
models of nutritional
condition for sect
mule
port. Both the mammal
and
avian
research

J Wildl Manage 71:1934-1943
D. Finley of CPW are deer.
thanked
for crucial ass
Cook RC, Cook JG, Stephenson
TR, Meyers
WL, McCorquodale
SM,
efforts. Additional funding
and
support
cam
DJ, Irwin
LL, Briggs Hall P, Spencer
RD, Murphie
SL,
Wildlife Restoration, Vales
the
Colorado
Mule
Deer
Schoenecker KA, Miller
PJ (2010) Revisions of
rump fat
and
rado Mule Deer Foundation,
Colorado
Oil
and
bodyProduction,
scoring indices for deer, elk, and EnCana,
moose. J Wildl Manage E
Commission, Williams
Shell Petroleum, and 74:880-896
Marathon Oil. We also t

&lt;£) Springer

This content downloaded from
45.130.83.192 on Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:24:26 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�390
Cote

Oecologia
SD,

179:377-391

Festa-Bianchet
Birthd
normalized difference M
vegetation (2001)
index curves reveals overwinter

mountain

age

(2015)

goat

kids:
effects
of
maternal
mule deer
survival is driven by both
spring and
autumn phenol-

c

quality.

Oecologia
ogy. Philos Trans 127:230-238
R Soc B Biol Sci 369:1-15
(1983) Iversen
Herbivory:
M, Fauchald P, Langeland K, Ims RA,
the
Yoccoz NG, dynam
Brathen

Crawley
MJ
tions.
Blackwell,

Oxford
KA (2014) Phenology and cover of plant growth forms predict
Daly
C,
Taylor
GH, herbivore
Gibson
habitat selection in aWP
high latitude ecosystem.
(1997)
Plos One
The
100780
ping
precipitation 9:e
and
temperature.
In:
P

AMS

Conference
Applied
Climatolo
Kudoon
G (1991) Effects
of snow-free period on
the phenology of alpine plants inhabiting snow patches. Arct Alp Res

October. American Meteroloeical Societv. do 10-12

Forchhammer MC, Clutton-Brock TH, Lindstrom J, Albon SD (2001) 23:436-443
Climate and population density induce long-term cohort variaKufeld RC, Bowden DC, Schrupp DL (1989) Distribution and movetion in a northern ungulate. J Anim Ecol 70:721-729
ments of female mule deer in the rocky mountain foothills. J
Fornara DA, Du Toit JT (2008) Browsing-induced effects on leaf litter Wildl Manage 53:871-877
quality and decomposition in a southern African savanna. EcoLendrum PE, Anderson CR Jr, Monteith KL, Jenks JA, Bowyer RT
systems 1 1 :23 8-249
(2013) Migrating mule deer: effects of anthropogenically altered
Fryxell JM, Wilmshurst JF et al (2005) Landscape scale, heterogene- landscapes. Plos One 8:64548
ity, and the viability of Serengeti grazers. Ecol Lett 8:328-335 Lendrum PE, Anderson CR Jr, Monteith KL, Jenks JA, Bowyer RT
Garrott RA, White GC, Bartmann RM, Capreenter LH, Alldredge AW (2014) Relating the movement of a rapidly migrating ungu(1987) Movements of female mule deer in northwest Colorado. J
late to spatiotemporal patterns of forage quality. Mamm Biol

79:369-375
Wildl Manage 51:634-643
Gass TM, Binkley D (2011) Soil nutrient losses in an altered ecoManier DJ, Hobbs NT (2007) Large herbivores in sagebrush steppe

system are associated with native ungulate grazing. J Appi Ecol ecosystems: livestock and wild ungulates influence structure and

48:952-960

function. Oecologia 152:739-750
Georgiadis N, Hack M, Turpin K (2003) The influence of rainfall
Martinez-Jauregui M, San Miguel-Ayanz A, Mysterud A, RodriguezC, Clutton-Brock T, Langvatn R, Coulson T (2009) Are
on zebra population dynamics: implications for management. Vigal
J
local weather, NDVI and NAO consistent determinants of red
Appi Ecol 40:125-136
Giroux M-A, Tremblay J-P, Simard MA, Yoccoz NG, Cote SD deer weight across three contrasting European countries? Glob
Chang Biol 15:1727-1738
(2014) Forage-mediated density and climate effects on body
Ballesteros M, Bârdsen B-J, Fauchald P, Langeland K, Stien A,
mass in a temperate herbivore: a mechanistic approach. Ecology
95:1332-1340

Tveraa T (2013) Combined effects of long-term feeding, popu-

Goheen JR, Palmer TM, Keesing F, Riginos C, Young TP (2010)
lation density and vegetation green-up on reindeer demography.
Ecosphere 4:45
Large herbivores facilitate savanna tree establishment via diverse
and indirect pathways. J Anim Ecol 79:372-382
McNaughton S J, Oesterheid M et al (1989) Ecosystem-level patterns
Haenel S, Tielboerger K (2015) Phenotypic response of plants to simof primary productivity and herbivory in terrestrial habitats.
Nature 341:142-144
ulated climate change in a long-term rain-manipulation experiMiddleton AD, Kauffman MJ, McWhirter DE, Cook JG, Cook RC,
ment: a multi-species study. Oecologia 177:1015-1024
Hamel S, Garel M, Festa-Bianchet M, Gaillard J-M, Cote SD (2009)
Nelson AA, Jimenez MD, Klaver RW (2013) Annual migration
Spring normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) predicts
amid shifting patterns of phenology and prédation: lessons from
a Yellowstone elk herd. Ecology 94:1245-1256
annual variation in timing of peak faecal crude protein in mountain ungulates. J Appi Ecol 46:582-589
Monteith KL, Bleich VC, Stephenson TR, Pierce BM, Conner MM,
Hamlin KL, Pac DF, Sime CA, DeSimone RM, Dusek GL (2000)
Kie JG, Bowyer RT (2014) Life-history characteristics of mule
deer: effects of nutrition in a variable environment. Wildl MonEvaluating the accuracy of ages obtained by two methods for
Montana ungulates. J Wildl Manage 64:441-449
ogr 186:1-62
Hebblewhite M, Merrill E, McDermid G (2008) A multi-scale test of Morisette JT, Jarnevich CS, Ullah A, Cai W, Pedelty JA, Gentle JE,
Stohlgren TJ, Schnase JL (2006) A tamarisk habitat suitability
the forage maturation hypothesis in a partially migratory ungulate population. Ecol Monogr 78:141-166
map for the continental United States. Front Ecol 4:1 1-17
Herbener KW, Tavener S J, Hobbs NT (2012) The distinct effects of Mysterud A, Austrheim G (2014) Lasting effects of snow accumulation on summer performance of large herbivores in alpine ecohabitat fragmentation on population size. Theor Ecol 5:73-82
systems may not last. J Anim Ecol 83:712-719
Herfindal I, Solberg EJ, Saether B-E, Hogda KA, Andersen R (2006)
Environmental phenology and geographical gradients in moose Mysterud A, Langvatn R, Yoccoz NG, Stenseth NC (2002) Largebody mass. Oecologia 150:213-224
scale habitat variability, delayed density effects and red deer
populations in Norway. J Anim Ecol 71:569-580
Hjeljord O, Hovik N, Pedersen HB (1990) Choice of feeding sites by
moose during summer, the influence of forest structure and plant Mysterud A, Yoccoz NG et al (2008) Hierarchical path analysis of
deer responses to direct and indirect effects of climate in northphenology. HolarctEcol 13:281-292

Hobbs NT (1996) Modification of ecosystems by ungulates. J Wildl

ern forest. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 363:2359-2368

Manage 60:695-713
Nicholson MC, Bowyer RT, Kie JG (1997) Habitat selection and survival of mule deer: tradeoffs associated with migration. J MamHobbs NT, Gordon I J (2010) How does landscape heterogeneity
mal 78:483-504
shape population dynamics? In: Owen Smith N (ed) Dynamics
of large herbivore populations in changing environments: toward Nielsen A, Yoccoz NG, Steinheim G, Storvik GO, Rekdal Y, Angeloff
M, Pettorelli N, Holand O, Mysterud A (2012) Are responses of
appropriate models. Wiley-Blackwell, USA
Hobbs NT, Galvin KA, Stokes CJ, Lackett JM, Ash AJ, Boone RB,
herbivores to environmental variability spatially consistent in

Reid RS, Thornton PK (2008) Fragmentation of rangelands:

alpine ecosystems? Glob Chang Biol 18:3050-3062

implications for humans, animals, and landscapes. Glob Environ Nkwabi AK, Sinclair ARE, Metzger KL, Mduma SAR (2011) Dis-

Chang Hum Policy Dimens 18:776-785
Hurley MA, Hebblewhite M, Gaillard J-M, Dray S, Taylor KA,
Smith WK, Zager P, Bonenfant C (2014) Functional analysis of

turbance, species loss and compensation: wildfire and grazing effects on the avian community and its food supply in the
Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania. Austral Ecol 36:403-412

Ô Springer

This content downloaded from
45.130.83.192 on Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:24:26 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�Oecologia

(2015)

179:377-391

EJ, Heim M, Grotan V,
Saether BE, Garel M (2007) Annual
Owen-Smith
NSolberg
(1990)
Demography
variation in maternal
age and calving date generate cohort effects
kudu
Tragelaphus
strepsiceros
,
Ecol 59:893-913
in moose ( Alces alces) body mass. Oecologia 154:259-271
Spiegelhalter DJ, Thomas A, Best NG (1999) WinBUGS version 1.2
Owen-Smith N (2004) Functional heterogeneity in resources within
user
landscapes and herbivore population dynamics. Lands Ecol

manual

Steinheim G, Mysterud A, Holand O, Bakken M, Adnoy T (2002) The

19:761-771

effect of initial weight of the ewe on later reproductive effort in
Parmesan C (2007) Influences of species, latitudes and methodologies
domestic sheep ( Ovis aries). J Zool 258:515-520
on estimates of phenological response to global warming. Glob
Chang Biol 13:1860-1872
Stephenson TR, Hundertmark KJ, Swartz CC, Van Ballenberghe V
(1998) Predicting body fat and mass in moose with untrasonogPaudel KP, Andersen P (2013) Response of rangeland vegetation to
raphy. Can J Zool 76:717-722
snow cover dynamics in Nepal Trans Himalaya. Clim Chang

117:149-162
Stephenson TR, Bleich VC, Pierce BM, Mulcahy GP (2002) Validation of mule deer body composition using in vivo and post-morPettorelli N, Dray S, Gaillard JM, Chessel D, Duncan P, Illius A,
Guillon N, Klein F, Van Laere G (2003) Spatial variation intem indices of nutritional condition. Wildl Soc Bull 30:557-564
Taillon
J, Brodeur V, Festa-Bianchet M, Cote SD (2012) Is mother
springtime food resources influences the winter body mass of
roe

deer fawns. Oecologia 137:363-369

Pettorelli N, Mysterud A, Yoccoz NG, Langvatn R, Stenseth NC
(2005a) Importance of climatological downscaling and plant

condition related to offspring condition in migratory caribou
(. Rangifer tarandus) at calving and weaning? Can J Zool Rev
Can Zool 90:393-402

phenology for red deer in heterogeneous landscapes. Proc R Soc Thackeray SJ, Sparks TH, Frederiksen M, Burthe S, Bacon PJ, Bell
B Biol Sci 272:2357-2364
JR, Botham MS, Brereton TM, Bright PW, Carvalho L, CluttonBrock T, Dawson A, Edwards M, Elliott JM, Harrington R, Johns
Pettorelli N, Vik JO, Mysterud A, Gaillard JM, Tucker CJ, Stenseth
D, Jones ID, Jones JT, Leech DI, Roy DB, Scott WA, Smith M,
NC (2005b) Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends Ecol EvolSmithers RJ, Winfield IJ, Wanless S (2010) Trophic level asyn20:503-510
chrony in rates of phenological change for marine, freshwater
Pettorelli N, Weladji RB, Holand O, Mysterud A, Breie H, Stensethand terrestrial environments. Glob Chang Biol 16:3304-3313
Van Reenen G (1982) Field experience in the capture of red deer by
NC (2005c) The relative role of winter and spring conditions:
linking climate and landscape- scale plant phenology to alpine helicopter in New Zealand with reference to post-capture sequela

and management. In: Nielsen L, Haigh JC, Fowler ME (eds)
reindeer body mass. Biol Lett 1:24-26
Pettorelli N, Gaillard JM, Mysterud A, Duncan P, Stenseth NC,Chemical immobilization of North American wildlife. Wisconsin
Delorme D, Van Laere G, Toigo C, Klein F (2006) Using a proxyHumane Society, Milwaukee, pp 408-421

Van Soest PJ (1994) Nutritional ecology of the ruminant, 2nd edn.
of plant productivity (NDVI) to find key periods for animal performance: the case of roe deer. Oikos 1 12:565-572
Cornell University, USA
DA, Halfpenny JC, Walker MD, Wessman CA (1993) LongPettorelli N, Pelletier F, von Hardenberg A, Festa-Bianchet M, Walker
Cote
SD (2007) Early onset of vegetation growth vs. rapid green-up: term studies of snow-vegetation interactions. Bioscience
impacts on juvenile mountain ungulates. Ecology 88:381-390 43:287-301
MD, Ingersoll RC, Webber PJ (1995) Effects of interannual
Pettorelli N, Ryan S, Mueller T, Bunnefeld N, Jedrzejewska B, Walker
Lima
M, Kausrud K (2011) The normalized difference vegetation climate variation on phenology and growth of 2 alpine forbs.

index (NDVI): unforeseen successes in animal ecology. Clim Ecology 76:1067-1083
Wang GM, Hobbs NT, Boone RB, Illius AW, Gordon U, Gross JE,
Rodriguez-Hidalgo P, Gortazar C, Tortosa FS, Rodriguez- Vigal C,Hamlin KL (2006) Spatial and temporal variability modify denFierro Y, Vicente J (2010) Effects of density, climate, and supple- sity dependence in populations of large herbivores. Ecology
Res 46:15-27

mentary forage on body mass and pregnancy rates of female red 87:95-102

White GC, Lubow BC (2002) Fitting population models to mulitple
deer in Spain. Oecologia 164:389-398
Searle KR, Hobbs NT, Jaronski ST (2010) Asynchrony, fragmenta- cources of observed data. J Wildl Manage 66(2):300-309
G, Rasmussen HB, Douglas-Hamilton I (2007) Breeding
tion, and scale determine benefits of landscape heterogeneityWittemyer
to
mobile herbivores. Oecologia 163:815-824
phenology in relation to NDVI variability in free-ranging African
Severinghaus CW (1949) Tooth development and wear as criteria ofelephant. Ecography 30:42-50
Yu HY, Luedeling E, Xu JC (2010) Winter and spring warming result
age in white- tailed deer. J Wildl Manage 13:195-216
Shipley B (2002) Cause and correlation in biology: a user's guide to in delayed spring phenology on the Tibetan Plateau. Proc Natl
path analysis, structural equations and causal inference. Cam- Acad Sci USA 107:22151-22156

bridge University Press, Cambridge

Singh NJ, Börger L, Dettki H, Bunnefeld N, Ericsson G (2012) From
migration to nomadism: movement variability in a northern
ungulate across its latitudinal range. Ecol Appi 22(7):2007-2020

Springer

This content downloaded from
45.130.83.192 on Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:24:26 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="2">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="479">
                <text>Journal Articles</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="7018">
                <text>CPW peer-reviewed journal publications</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="611">
              <text>Asynchronous vegetation phenology enhances winter body condition of a large mobile herbivore</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="612">
              <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"&gt;In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted&lt;/a&gt;</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="56">
          <name>Date Created</name>
          <description>Date of creation of the resource.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="613">
              <text>2015-05-26</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="614">
              <text>Mule deer</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="615">
              <text>Spatial heterogeneity</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="616">
              <text>Temporal heterogeneity</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="617">
              <text>Western Colorado</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="618">
              <text>Climate change</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="41">
          <name>Description</name>
          <description>An account of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="619">
              <text>Understanding how spatial and temporal heterogeneity influence ecological processes forms a central challenge in ecology. Individual responses to heterogeneity shape population dynamics, therefore understanding these responses is central to sustainable population management. Emerging evidence has shown that herbivores track heterogeneity in nutritional quality of vegetation by responding to phenological differences in plants. We quantified the benefits mule deer (&lt;em&gt;Odocoileus hemionus&lt;/em&gt;) accrue from accessing habitats with asynchronous plant phenology in northwest Colorado over 3 years. Our analysis examined both the direct physiological and indirect environmental effects of weather and vegetation phenology on mule deer winter body condition. We identified several important effects of annual weather patterns and topographical variables on vegetation phenology in the home ranges of mule deer. Crucially, temporal patterns of vegetation phenology were linked with differences in body condition, with deer tending to show poorer body condition in areas with less asynchronous vegetation green-up and later vegetation onset. The direct physiological effect of previous winter precipitation on mule deer body condition was much less important than the indirect effect mediated by vegetation phenology. Additionally, the influence of vegetation phenology on body fat was much stronger than that of overall vegetation productivity. In summary, changing annual weather patterns, particularly in relation to seasonal precipitation, have the potential to alter body condition of this important ungulate species during the critical winter period. This finding highlights the importance of maintaining large contiguous areas of spatially and temporally variable resources to allow animals to compensate behaviourally for changing climate-driven resource patterns.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="39">
          <name>Creator</name>
          <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="621">
              <text>Searle, Kate R. </text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="622">
              <text>Rice, Mindy B. </text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="623">
              <text>Anderson Jr, Charles R.</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="624">
              <text>Bishop, Chad J.</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="1911">
              <text>Hobbs, N. T. </text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="625">
              <text>English</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="70">
          <name>Is Part Of</name>
          <description>A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="626">
              <text>Oecologia</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="78">
          <name>Extent</name>
          <description>The size or duration of the resource.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="628">
              <text>15 pages</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="80">
          <name>Bibliographic Citation</name>
          <description>A bibliographic reference for the resource. Recommended practice is to include sufficient bibliographic detail to identify the resource as unambiguously as possible.</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="629">
              <text>Searle, K. R., M. B. Rice, C. R. Anderson Jr, C. Bishop and N. T. Hobbs. 2015. Asynchronous vegetation phenology enhances winter body condition of a large mobile herbivore. Oecologia 179:377–391. &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3348-9" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442–015–3348–9&lt;/a&gt;</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="42">
          <name>Format</name>
          <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="760">
              <text>application/pdf</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="7168">
              <text>Article</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
