<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="637" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://cpw.cvlcollections.org/items/show/637?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-04-05T15:09:01+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="1637">
      <src>https://cpw.cvlcollections.org/files/original/e2e32a7cea8fa0563e4b41436c52e943.pdf</src>
      <authentication>267eda9c65bdfa9cc30b3a360b88df1b</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="92">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="8940">
                  <text>PROGRAi~

PROGRESS REPORT

COLORADO
Project No.

Project Type:~__R_e_s_e_a_r_c_h________

SE - 3 - 2

Job No.
2
Work Plan No. __I..._I=I~-------Job Title: Endangered Wildlife Investigations: Lynx and Wolverine Verifcation
Period Covered:
Personnel:

October 1, 1978 to April 30, 1979

Steven J. Bissel, John R. Torres, James C. Halfpenny, David Nead.
ABSTRACT

Over 3,000 posters soliciting information were distributed to District
Wildlife Hanagers, taxidermists, trappers, outfitters, libraries, universities,
federal and state agencies.

Museums were visited and individuals were

interviewed to obtain historical background.

Distributional maps were

produced to evaluate the best possible areas for locating both species.
Field work was conducted in four areas fo~ · wolverine and two areas
for lynx.

Over 400 miles of trail were searched for tracks and signs.

Trained dogs were used to verify "cat" tracks.

Baited hair snags were set

to obtain hair samples.
One wolverine shot near the Colorado-Utah border was processed during the
project.
J·
~

Two lynx were tracked in the central portion of Colorado.

Compilation of reports and sightings indicate that both the wolverine and
the lynx probably still have breeding populations in Colorado.
further work is needed to verify wolverine existence.

However,

The known population

of Coloradoan lynx should be monitored to determine their range and evaluate
habitat.

i

1iliilOOiWiiOO~
BDOW021592

�TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Program Segment Narrative •

1

Methods and Materials

1

Results

2

Discussion

3

.... . .

Literature Cited

·~

ii

7

�-~3

r

LYNX AND WOLVERINE VERIFICATION

\~

PROGRAM SEGMENT NARRATIVE

Due to the lack of data, it is impossible to determine the current
status of either the lynx (Lynx canadensis)or the wolverine (Gulo gulo)
in Colorado.

Only two confirmed wolverine reports have been made in

recent years while confirmed lynx reports number but ten (Bissell, 1978a
and 1978 b; Halfpenny et. al., 1979 and in press; T.errill, 1970).
Little is known about their natural history in Colorado and essential
habitat has not~been determined (Bissel, 1978a).

Armstrong (1972),

Lechleitner (1969), and Warren (1942) list historical records of both
species.
No published ecological studies exist for either mammal in the
continental United States.

European literature indicates that the

diet of the wolverine consists mainly of cervid species with hare
(Lepus) and ptarmigan (Alopex) often of minor importance.
of the lynx

consists largely of hares.

The diet

The wolverine primarily

subsists as a scavenger while the lynx is an active predator.

Both

animals, under the right conditions, can kill large ungulates.
Both mammals are mainly boreal in distribution, being found at or
above timberline in dense conifer forests and rocky areas.

Denning

areas have not been investigated in the States.
The purpose of this study was to verify wolverine and lynx
populations and determine their range within Colorado.

METHODS AND MATERIALS
Reports of wolverine and lynx were solicited from the public
by distributing over 3,000 posters to District Wildlife Manager,
taxidermists, trappers, outfitters, libraries, universities, federal
and state agencies and using radio, television, and newspaper stories.
Based on the descriptions given, reports were identified as to species
of mammal observed and the quality of the report was then determined.
Reliable reports were used to determine main geographic areas of
interest.

Museums were visited and interviews conducted to obtain

�2

historical information to compare to the reports that were received.
Based on the quality and quantity of reports, four main

areas

possibly supporting wolverine populations were selected for field work.
In these areas, baited hair snags (cylinders made out of hardware cloth
and barbed wire; Hummel, 1978) were placed.

Trails were searched by

snowmobiles and crosscountry skis to locate mammal tracks.
Two areas were selected for lynx verifications work.
and skis were again used to search trails for tracks.
and houndsman was retained.

Snowmobiles

A local trapper

His trained dogs were used to verify

"cat" tracks.
RESULTS
From February 1, 1979 to April 30, 1979, project personnel,
District Wildlife Managers, and volunteers traveled over 2500 miles on
420 miles of trail.

During this time two lynx were trailed on the

Frying Pan River.

These tracks represent the first reports of lynx

since 1974.

Six recent lynx reports and three older reports were

obtained from interviews.

Two previously unreported

mounted lynx

specimens were observed.

One of these animals, trapped on the Vail

ski slopes, is now in the law enforcement office of the Division.

The

other, which was trapped near Guanella Pass, resides in the Jefferson
County Outdoor School collection.

A third lynx (reported by Terrill,

1971) is in the private collection of Pete Sherwood.

The three lynx

were harvested in 1974, 1972, and 1969 respectively.
On October 25, 1978, project personnel monitored the release by
private individuals of a male and a female wolverine at a site about
15 miles due south of Aspen.

These animals, trapped in Canada about

three months before the release, were part of a movie being filmed
by Stouffer Enterprises and John Denver.

No reports have been received

by the Division office indicating that these animals have been observed.
Early in the project, pieces of a wolverine skull found in the
San Juan Mountains of Colorado, were sent to the Division.

It was not

possible to determine how long the animal had been dead but a reasonable
guess maybe between 10 and 25 years.

�J

Both tracking and hair snags failed to provide evidence of wolverine.
Although hair was obtained from 30% of the hair snags, no wolverine
hair was found.
Aproximately 60 reports may have actually observed wolverine.
Of the 60 reports, 25 were rated as probable sightings and 35 as
possible sightings, a lower quality category.
On March 15, 1979, a male wolverine in reproductive condition was
shot near the Colorado-Utah border.

Due.to legal hassles revolving

around the exact location of the death of the animal, the individual
has retained the animal and will not allow it to be used for scientific
investigations.

The animal however must have had at least part of its

range in Colorado, if not all of its range.
Data from reports, museums and interviews were used to construct
distributional maps for Colorado (fig-. 1 and 2).

Results of this

study were presented at the Colorado - Wyoming Academy of Science.
Lynx distributional information has been incorporated into a paper to
be submitted to the Journal of Marnrnalogy.

Bibliographic material

obtained through the study will be published as part of the Bibliography~ Mustelids

series.

Finally, Mammalian Species has agreed to

publish our Wolverine Mammalian Species which will be completed during
the coming year.

DISCUSSION
Wolverine verification:
The wolverine killed in northwestern Colorado and several very
credible reports indicate that a small population exists in Colorado.
Evaluation of sighting reports indicate populations may be highest
south and southwest of the Flat Tops in Garfield County and on the west,
south, and east sides of North Park in Jackson County.

These two areas

should be intensively worked during another field season.
lines should be set.up and checked weekly.

Hair snag

Frequent runs should be

made on snow covered trails to check for tracks.

�4

Lynx verification:
Tracks and records indicate a small population of lynx in Pitkin,
Eagle, and Lake Counties.

Further work will undoubtably expand the

known range of this population.

It is highly probable that work in

other remote areas of similar habitat will disclose additional
populations.
The Colorado lynx population represents the existance of lynx at
their extreme limits.Knowledge of this population
important.

is therefore very

Our field work indicates that· lynx are ..."rare" in Colorado,

and more knowl~dge is needed before their status can be evaluated.

�Colorado Wolverine Reports
State map shown is overlayed with a
9,000 foot contour..

*

41

- r Skull of a Wolverine received
from Mr. Al Williams
Delta, Colorado.

e --- Wolverine reports received

prior to verification program
October 1, 1978.
• ---Wolverine reports received
• October 1, 1978 to April 30, 1979.

Figur~

(

1.

Colorado Wolverine Reports.

(

(

�•

*--

C0 L 0 RAD0

L Y NX

REC0 RDS

Recent specimens

.._ -- Tr~k records obtained by the Lynx
Verification Program 1978-79
ft -- Colorado Trapper's

Survey

1975

• -- Literature records from Allen (1874),
Armstrong (1972), Cary (1911), Seton
(1929), Warren (1906, 1942), and
Young (1958).

The 9,000 foot contour is shown.
------~---------------------------SOUTHERN LIMITS OF LYNX
DISTRIBUTION
Extralirnital records indicated
by triangles.

Figure 2.

(

Colorado Lynx Records and the Southern Limits of Lynx Distribution.

c

(

�7
Literature Cited

Armstrong, D. M. 1972. Distribution of Mammals in Colorado.
Univ. Mus. Nat. Hist., 3:x + 1 - 415.

Monogr.,

Bissell, s. J. 1978:1.. Pp. 76,77,80, and 81 in Torres, J. et al. 1978.
Essential Habitat for Threatened or Endangered Wildlife in Colorado.
Bissell, S. J. 1978b. Bissell, s. J. (ed.). 1978. Colorado Mammal
Distribution Latilong Study. Colo. Div. Wild!. DOW-R-D-10 ii + 20 pp.
Halfpenny, J. C., D. Nead, and S. J. Bissell. 1979. Colorado
Wolverine-Lynx Verification Program • . J. Colo.-Wyo. Acad. Sci.,
11(1) :89.
Abst •
..
Halfpenny, J. c., S. J. Bissell, and D. Nead. 1979. The southern limits
of lynx (Lynx canadensis) distribution in North America with special
reference to Colorado. To be submitted to J. Wildl. Man. in the
fall of 1979.
Hummel, J. E. 1978. Furbearer study, Sierra County, California. 1977-78.
The Resource Agency, State of Calif. 21 pp. Fed. Project Report
W-54-R-10.
Lechleitner, R. R. Wild mammals of Colorado: their appearance, habits,
distirbution, and abundance. Pruett Publishing Co., Boulder,
xiv + 254 pp.
Terrell, B.

1971.

Lynx.

Colo. Outdoors, 20(5) :19.

Warren, E. R. 1942. The Mammals of Colorado. Colo. College Puhl.,
Gen. Ser. 19 (Sci. Ser., 46): 225-274.

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="37">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9021">
                <text>Mammals research pdfs</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="9022">
                <text>Pdfs of mammals research projects by title . Pdfs are linked from this page. Includes federal aid progress reports and non federal aid progress reports. If reports cover more than one year they are combined into one pdf.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8941">
              <text>Mammals Research Projects pdfs (1971-1980)</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="8942">
              <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-NC/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Only&lt;/a&gt;</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
