Sources of measurement error, misclassification error, and bias in auditory avian point count data

Item Metadata

Dublin Core

Title

Sources of measurement error, misclassification error, and bias in auditory avian point count data

Description

Avian point counts vary over space and time due to actual differences in abundance, differences in detection probabilities among counts, and differences associated with measurement and misclassification errors. However, despite the substantial time, effort, and money expended counting birds in ecological research and monitoring, the validity of common survey methods remains largely untested, and there is still considerable disagreement over the importance of estimating detection probabilities associated with individual counts. Most practitioners assume that current methods for estimating detection probability are accurate, and that observer training obviates the need to account for measurement and misclassification errors in point count data. Our approach combines empirical data from field studies with field experiments using a system for simulating avian census conditions when most birds are identified by sound. Our objectives are to: identify the factors that influence detection probability on auditory point counts, quantify the bias and precision of current sampling methods, and find new applications of sampling theory and methodologies that produce practical improvements in the quality of bird census data.

We have found that factors affecting detection probabilities on auditory counts, such as ambient noise, can cause substantial biases in count data. Distance sampling data are subject to substantial measurement error due to the difficulty of estimating the distance to a sound source when visual cues are lacking. Misclassification errors are also inherent in time of detection methods due to the difficulty of accurately identifying and localizing sounds during a count. Factors affecting detection probability, measurement errors, and misclassification errors are important but often ignored components of the uncertainty associated with point-count-based abundance estimates.

Bibliographic Citation

Simons, T. R., K. H. Pollock, J. M. Wettroth, M. W. Alldredge, K. Pacifici, and J. Brewster. 2009. Sources of measurement error, misclassification error, and bias in auditory avian point count data. Pages 237–254 in Thomson D.L., E.G. Cooch, M.J. Conroy, editors. Modeling demographic processes in marked populations. Environmental and ecological statistics. Volume 3. Springer, Boston, USA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78151-8_10

Creator

Simons, Theodore R.
Pollock, Kenneth H.
Wettroth, John M.
Pacifici, Krishna
Brewster, Jerome
Alldredge, Mathew W.

Subject

Detection probability
Ambient noise
Point count
Misclassification error
Breeding bird survey

Extent

18 pages

Date Created

2009

Type

Article

Format

application/pdf

Language

English

Is Part Of

Modeling Demographic Processes in Marked Populations

Collection

Citation

Simons, Theodore R. et al., “Sources of measurement error, misclassification error, and bias in auditory avian point count data,” CPW Digital Collections, accessed November 26, 2024, https://cpw.cvlcollections.org/items/show/81.