551 items found
Led By
Lake and Reservoir Researchers
Study Area
Select reservoirs
Project Status
Ongoing
Research Objectives
- Monitor the response of target fishes to incentivized angling.
- Monitor the participation and harvest dynamics of anglers.
- Develop population models and other quantitative tools to inform the biological effectiveness of ongoing incentivized angling efforts.
Project Description
CPW strives to provide the best sport fishing opportunities that are appropriate for each water body in the state of Colorado. Opportunities in some locations may not be appropriate for others given differences in management objectives, the need to protect native fish species in sensitive locations, the need to maintain wild broodstocks that provide valuable eggs to the states hatchery system, or other ecological factors.
One example is the presence of nonnative predatory sport fish like smallmouth bass and northern pike stocked historically or illegally into some reservoirs on the western slope of Colorado that are located upstream of critical river and stream habitats for unique native fishes. The presence of these predatory fish undermines conservation efforts because they can escape the reservoirs, establish populations downstream, and eat or compete with native fish.
One of CPW’s missions is to protect native species that represent the ecology and natural history of the state. Sometimes, management actions to limit nonnative predatory sport fish in unwanted locations is necessary. Therefore, CPW has been implementing fishing tournaments in locations like Ridgway (southwest Colorado) and Elkhead (northwest Colorado) reservoirs where anglers can win cash prizes by helping CPW remove unwanted predatory fishes from the reservoirs to favor more compatible sport fish species.
Harvest of sport fish is also sometimes needed for reasons other than native fish protection. For example, the need to maintain predator-prey balance in systems like Blue Mesa Reservoir (southwest Colorado) where consumption of stocked kokanee salmon by naturally reproducing lake trout can become unsustainable. Here, periodic harvest incentives are used to remove overabundant small lake trout (greatest predation impact on juvenile kokanee based on previous research) to help maintain the adult kokanee population where needed for egg-collection purposes and to maintain angling opportunities for trophy (even world record) lake trout.
In both contexts, Lake and Reservoir Researchers have been working alongside managers collecting additional biological information and developing quantitative survey or modeling tools to inform the effectiveness of these angler incentive programs, identify potential avenues for increasing effectiveness if necessary, and to enable adaptive decision making.
Associated Publications
Cristan, E.T. 2021. Angler incentives: lucrative lake trout in Blue Mesa Reservoir. Colorado Outdoors Magazine. September/October Issue, Vol. 70, No. 5.
Hansen, A.G., J.M. Lepak, E.I. Gardunio, and T. Eyre. 2024. Evaluating harvest incentives for suppressing a socially-valued, but ecologically-detrimental, invasive fish predator. Fisheries Management and Ecology 31:e12699.
Pate, W.M., B.M. Johnson, J.M. Lepak, and D. Brauch. 2014. Managing for coexistence of kokanee and trophy lake trout in a montane reservoir. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 34:908-922.
[show more]Led By
Kevin Thompson, Jenn Logan
Study Area
Colorado River Basin
Project Status
Ongoing
Research Objectives
- To characterize Colorado-wide genetic diversity and purity among native sucker populations.
- To ensure proper geographic representation of each species of sucker in brood stocks at CPW's Native Aquatic Species Restoration Facility (NASRF) in Alamosa.
- To determine whether CPW researchers and biologists are encountering hybrid suckers that appear pure and to gauge accuracy in identifying which parental species are involved in hybrid specimens.
Photos:Top right: Mouth of Pure Bluehead SuckerBottom right: Mouth of Bluehead/White Sucker Hybrid
Project Description
Flannelmouth and bluehead sucker populations have declined in recent years, prompting CPW to focus efforts towards protecting and enhancing existing populations of these ecologically important fishes. Both flannelmouth and bluehead suckers will hybridize with non-native sucker species introduced to the Western Slope, threatening the genetic purity of the natives. To combat this problem or to re-establish populations of the native suckers, CPW needs to prepare for the use of captive-reared fish, necessitating the establishment of one or more brood stocks for each species.
Therefore, CPW initiated a study to characterize the genetic purity and diversity of suckers from river drainages across Colorado. To do so, researchers and biologists collected genetic samples from pure suckers to establish reference populations with which future genetic specimens could be compared. Afterwards, hundreds more samples were collected from numerous locations around the Western Slope to assess which populations remain the purest and also to determine how genetically diverse the various populations are. Results from this study helped determine how many brood stocks of each species CPW should maintain at NASRF in order to appropriately represent the genetic diversity of wild populations.
At the time of sampling, collectors attempted to visually identify the species of each sucker and several photographs were taken. Some fish of each species and each hybrid combination were retained as specimens for archiving and future study, as well as for future training in identification. Each genetic sample was analyzed and assigned to species or species mixes for hybrids. Genetic identifications were then compared to field identifications to assess agreement.
We discovered that biologists and researchers were quite accurate in identifying pure fish versus hybrid fish; however, identification of which parental species were represented in hybrid fish was very challenging especially when more than two ancestral species were represented in hybrid fish.
Video: Bluehead Sucker Spawning
A rare view of these beautifully colored Colorado native Bluehead Suckers showing spawning behavior in the Roubideau Creek drainage near Delta, Colorado. Shot by a BLM employee in May 2012, this is a sight rarely seen in Colorado because the water is usually much less clear during the runoff when these fish spawn. You will see several brightly colored males attending to a single, less colored female. [show more]Led ByJedediah Brodie, Heather Johnson (CPW), Michael Mitchell, Peter Zager, Kelly Proffitt, Mark Hebblewhite, Matthew Kauffman, Bruce Johnson, John Bissonette, Chad Bishop (CPW), Justin Gude, Jeff Herbert, Kent Hersey, Mark Hurley, Paul Lukacs, Scott McCorquodale, Eliot McIntire, Josh Nowak, Hall Sawyer, Douglas Smith and P.J. White
Study AreaWestern North America
Project StatusCompleted
Research Objectives
- To determine the relative influence of predation, weather, habitat, land-use and harvest on adult female elk survival.
Project Description
The challenges facing elk management in western landscapes are increasing at a rapid pace as changes to habitat, climate and predator communities influence elk population demography and behavior.
In an effort to understand these new challenges and effectively manage elk in the future, researchers across seven states in western North America began to communicate about shared management challenges and research needs. Collaborators decided that a region-wide study across all the states would provide managers a big-picture view of how broad-scale drivers are influencing elk populations.
Therefore, CPW collaborated with state and federal wildlife agencies in Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Washington, Oregon and Utah to investigate large-scale temporal and spatial patterns in adult female elk survival and cause-specific mortality.
Results from this study will help wildlife managers better respond to changing environmental conditions in the future.
Collaborators for this project include personnel from the USGS Montana Wildlife Cooperative Research Unit, USGS Wildlife Cooperative Research Unit, USGS Wyoming Cooperative Research Unit, Idaho Fish and Game, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Wyoming Game and Fish Department, and Yellowstone National Park.
Associated Publications
Brodie, J., H. Johnson, M. Mitchell, P. Zager, K. Proffitt, M. Hebblewhite, M. Kauffman, B. Johnson, J. Bissonette, C. Bishop, J. Gude, K. Hersey, M. Hurley, P. Lukacs, S. McCorquodale, E. McIntire, J. Nowak, D. Smith, and P.J. White. 2013. Relative influence of human harvest, carnivores, and weather on adult female elk survival across western North America. Journal of Applied Ecology 50:295-305.
[show more]<em>Centrocercus urophasianus</em>
Parachute-Piceance-Roan (PPR) region
Wildlife management
Northwestern Colorado
<em>Centrocercus urophasianus</em>
Parachute-Piceance-Roan (PPR) region
Wildlife management
Northwestern Colorado
Led By
Study Area
South Canal of the Gunnison River
Project Status
Complete
Research Objectives
- To monitor fish population trends in the canal and evaluate the effectiveness of an electric fish barrier in reducing fish entrainment through a marked fish study
Project Description
There are over 105,000 irrigation structures on rivers and streams across Colorado, most in fish-bearing waters. Fish entrainment in irrigation canals is known to be a large problem in the western U.S. but its impact on fish populations in Colorado is unknown. The South Canal, an irrigation ditch in southwest Colorado, diverts about 360,000 acre feet of water each year (around 1,000 cfs per day) from the Gunnison River into the Uncompahgre Valley for agricultural irrigation use. With the construction of several new hydropower plants on the canal in 2012, CPW expected to see an increase in fish mortality and impacts to recreational fishing in the South Canal and Uncompahgre River.
In order to reduce impacts on the Gunnison River's Gold Medal trout fishery, an electric fish barrier was installed at the east portal of the canal. Consisting of a series of vertically suspended electrodes, the system aims to discourage brood stock fish from entering the canal and potentially dying in the hydropower turbines.
CPW initiated a study to compare fish populations in the canal before and after the barrier was built and to document fish movement across the barrier with tagged fish.
Study results revealed that some fish passed through the barrier and survived the turbines, with more small fish successfully passing than large fish. Fish population estimates in the canal have declined after the electric barrier, but not significantly at the 95% level. A total of 288 tagged fish less than 12 inches and four fish greater than 12 inches were recovered below the barrier. No fish greater than 16 inches have been documented crossing the barrier. Only 1.3% of all tagged fish were documented to have been entrained in the canal while the barrier was operating.
The electric barrier appears to successfully exclude larger fish from the study reach, but not age 1 and age 0 trout. The electric fish barrier is successful in its stated objective, but not in reducing overall fish densities in the canal because the growth and survival of smaller fish maintains a stable population of fish in the canal. Reducing the entrainment of large fish is likely a benefit to the trout population of the Gunnison River. Further study is needed to evaluate if smaller trout can be successfully excluded by the electric barrier.
Associated Publication
[show more]Fishing
South canal
Research
Fishing
South canal
Research
Crop damage
Electric fence
Elk
Mule deer
Odocoileus hemionus
Repellent
Sunflowers
Wildlife damage management
Winged fence
Crop damage
Electric fence
Elk
Mule deer
Odocoileus hemionus
Repellent
Sunflowers
Wildlife damage management
Winged fence
Cause-specific mortality
Colorado
Conflict
Homing
Survival
Translocation
<em>Ursus americanus</em>
Cause-specific mortality
Colorado
Conflict
Homing
Survival
Translocation
<em>Ursus americanus</em>
Mule deer
Management
Habitat
Mule deer
Management
Habitat