561 items found
<em>Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus</em>
Breeding status
Habitat
Southwest Colorado
<em>Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus</em>
Breeding status
Habitat
Southwest Colorado
<em>Cynomys gunnisoni</em>
Plague
Fact sheet
<em>Cynomys gunnisoni</em>
Plague
Fact sheet
Led By
Study Area
Plains streams of eastern Colorado in the South Platte and Arkansas River basins
Project Status
Ongoing (this site selection tool will be used on an annual basis to guide sampling efforts)
Research Objectives
To guide biologists to the most efficient sampling locations to reduce uncertainty given logistical and financial constraints.
Collaborators
Dr. Kristin Broms and Dr. Mevin Hooten, Colorado Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Colorado State University
Project Description
Due to logistical, financial, and time constraints on staff, it is important that field activities are conducted as efficiently as possible and result in data that are statistically rigorous and defensible. This is especially essential when there are several species of interest. This project provides a site selection tool for eastern plains native fishes that is adaptable to changing management priorities, and can be accomplished within the logistical parameters set by CPW staff. The site selection process consists of five steps (Figure 1):
- The data. The data provide structure for the model, the desired inference, and the design criterion. Defining the data includes setting the boundaries, scale, and resolution of the area of inference, checking and cleaning the data that have been collected, and obtaining potential covariates.
- The model. The model structure and output make the inference associated with the monitoring efforts explicit and concrete.
- The design criterion. The design criterion is a formal connection between monitoring and the model, and is the quantity of interest about which improved inference is desired. It is a single statistic that summarizes the uncertainty associated with the study and is used to compare the efficiencies of sampling at various sets of locations in the future.
- Selecting sites for future sampling. This step involves finding the set of sites that minimizes the design criterion, which in this case is uncertainty regarding native species’ distributions.
- Collect more data and repeat. After future sites are selected and sampled, the model is re-fit with the new data and modified as necessary. Because the design criterion is based on the parameter estimates or posterior distributions, the next set of optimal sites will change with the newly fitted model. It is this responsiveness to new data that makes the procedure ideal for optimal long-term monitoring.
This protocol results in a sampling design that is statistically rigorous and biologist friendly. Biologists tell the model how many sites they are able to sample, and the model optimizes on those constraints. This protocol is optimal in that it optimizes on one metric—uncertainty.
Uncertainty across the species and weights selected according to management priorities. The protocol is adaptive in that it incorporates new data learning—as management objectives change, this protocol can change with them. This procedure has been used by biologists for the previous three field seasons, and is scheduled to be an ongoing, annual site selection tool.
Associated Publications
Broms, K. M., M. B. Hooten, and R. M. Fitzpatrick. 2015. Accounting for imperfect detection in Hill numbers for biodiversity studies. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6:99–108.
Broms, K. M., M. B. Hooten, and R. M. Fitzpatrick. 2016. Model selection and assessment for multi-species occupancy models. Ecology 97:1759–1770.Broms, K. M. and R. M. Fitzpatrick. 2016. A procedure manual for optimal adaptive sampling design for multiple species of plains fishes in eastern Colorado. Colorado Parks and Wildlife. Fort Collins, Colorado.
[show more]The eastern plains streams of Colorado are home to the highest fish species diversity in the state, which historically consisted of 36 native species. Unfortunately, six species have been extirpated, and 12 more are currently listed as special status by the State of Colorado. These species are part of our state’s natural history, and Colorado Parks and Wildlife is tasked with conserving them.
Plains Fish Research Projects:
[show more]Biological monitoring
Upper Colorado River
Windy Gap Reservoir
Biological monitoring
Upper Colorado River
Windy Gap Reservoir
Pinyon pine
Juniper
Pinyon pine
Juniper
Led By
Bill Pate at Colorado State University, Andrew Treble, and Lake and Reservoir Researchers
Study Area
Select coldwater reservoirs
Project Status
Ongoing
Research Objectives
- Monitor the depth-distribution, density, size structure, and abundance of pelagic fish species in key coldwater reservoirs.
- Monitor zooplankton species assemblage and density.
- Monitor invasive Mysis shrimp densities where present.
Project Description
Hydroacoustic surveys enable rapid estimation of the abundance, density, size structure, and depth-distribution of pelagic (or offshore/open water) fish species such as kokanee and lake trout. Mobile hydroacoustics is a quantitative method for sampling the water column of a large lake or reservoir with sound that allows for greater spatial coverage than gill netting or midwater trawling. Survey transects are completed overnight during the dark of the moon to allow for greater spatial distribution of the fish.
Hydroacoustic surveys are generally most effective when few pelagic species are present, and Colorado has many coldwater reservoirs containing relatively simple pelagic fish assemblages. Kokanee waters, such as Lake Granby and Blue Mesa Reservoir, provide upwards of $30 million in economic benefit to the state annually and are vital broodstocks that supply eggs to support statewide stocking efforts. Hydroacoustic surveys conducted on these and other waters are necessary for monitoring the health of these valuable fisheries and identifying when additional management interventions or research might be required to ensure stable populations.
In addition, monitoring zooplankton species assemblages and Mysis shrimp densities are an important aspect of this assessment project. Kokanee are an obligate planktivorous species that feed on zooplankton like Daphnia, and lake trout rely upon Mysis shrimp when young before turning to kokanee or other fishes as a forage base. In addition, detrimental invasive species of zooplankton such as Daphnia lumholtzi can be detected as early as possible through this monitoring program. Better monitoring practices allow for more informed management decisions for a given water body.
Associated Publications
Lepak, J.M., W.M. Pate, P. Cadmus, A.G. Hansen, K.D. Gallaher, and D. Silver. 2024. Response of an invasive aquatic crustacean to the fish toxicant rotenone. Lake and Reservoir Management 40:330-337.
[show more]